Skip to content
The McAndrews Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The McAndrews Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$17kFood & Nutrition$15kHousing & Shelter$12kHuman Services$10kEducation$7kReligion$4kArts & Culture$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA$2,500
PROJECT HOME$1,500
HELP HOPE LIVE$1,500
PHILABUNDANCE$1,250
PETER'S PLACE$1,250
LASALLE ACADEMY$1,000
DAMION COUNSELING CENTER$500
REMEMBER JEA FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $1k → 6%L'ARCHE GREATER WASHINGTON DC: $2k → 14%CAMPAGNA CENTER: $2k → 9%L'ARCHE GREATER WASHINGTON DC: $1k → 14%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%DAMION COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 6%DAMION COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%DAMION COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 6%DAMION COUNSELING CENTER: $500 → 6%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%DAMION COUNSELING CENTER: $500 → 6%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
KY
VA
DE
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$54k · 13 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

$54k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+32%

Still filing today

85%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Philabundance
    4× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +0%
  • LI
    LARCHE Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • A
    ACHIEVEABILITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • GH
    GEISINGER HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +118%
  • GE
    GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +674%
  • TB
    THE BARNES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
3
Merakey Idd Philadelphia

The organization was formed to serve all functioning levels of individuals with intellectual developmental disabilities who reside primarily in the philadelphia metropolitan area. services provided include residential, outpatient and adult…

—
4
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
5
Share Food Program

As the largest serving hunger-relief organization in the greater philadelphia region, share food program's mission is reducing regional food insecurity by providing nourishing food to a network of community-based partners and directly to…

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
8
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
9
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
10
Disability Rights of Pennsylvania

Drp protects and advocates for rights of people with disabilities so that they may live the lives they choose, free from abuse, neglect, discrimination and segregation.

Civil Rights
11
Leadingage Inc

The mission of leadingage is to be the trusted voice for aging. our 6,000+ members and partners include nonprofit organizations representing the entire field of aging services, 38 state associations, hundreds of businesses, consumer…

Housing & Shelter
12
Montco Anti-Hunger Network

By leading coordinated action, montco anti-hunger network strengthens the food security safety net system in montgomery county, pa, working to end hunger in montgomery county.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance; the most unlike its peers is The Campagna Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT HOME: $9,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEDAEMION COUNSELING CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesDAEMION COUNSELING CENTER INCLARCHE Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesLARCHE IncTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INCCANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $1,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $7,250 · Food & NutritionMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGH…Philabundance: $5,750 · Food & NutritionPhilabundanceTHE FOOD TRUST: $1,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD TRUSTFeeding America: $500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $500 · Food & NutritionOUR LADY QUEEN OF PEACE: $3,250 · OtherOUR LADY QUEEN OF PEA…SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION: $1,250 · OtherSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FO…NAMI - NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES: $1,000 · OtherNAMI - NATIONAL ALLIA…CHOP FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherCHOP FOUNDATIONRARE VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherRARE VILLAGE FOUNDATI…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODKENTUCKY AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 · OtherOUR LADY QUEEN OF PEACE CHURCH: $500 · OtherREMEMBER JEA FOUNDATION: $500 · OtherGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $1,500 · OtherGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MI…THE BARNES FOUNDATION: $1,500 · OtherTHE BARNES FOUNDATIONNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $500 · OtherALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC: $2,000 · HealthALS UNITED MI…HELPHOPELIVE INC: $2,000 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE …Maternity Care Coalition: $1,750 · HealthMaternity Car…GEISINGER HEALTH: $1,500 · HealthGEISINGER HEA…AUTISM DELAWARE INC: $750 · HealthAUTISM DELAWA…International OCD Foundation Inc: $500 · HealthInternational…LA SALLE ACADEMY: $7,000 · EducationLA SALLE AC…NURTURING MINDS INC: $500 · EducationNURTURING M…PETER'S PLACE: $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentACHIEVEABILITY: $2,250 · Housing & ShelterMISSION FIRST HOUSING GROUP INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$19,500Food & Nutrition$15,000Other$13,500Health$8,500Education$7,500Youth Development$4,500Housing & Shelter$2,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT HOME: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $7,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLA SALLE ACADEMY: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPhilabundance: $5,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAEMION COUNSELING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPETER'S PLACE: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLARCHE Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEVEABILITY: $2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMaternity Care Coalition: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM DELAWARE INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNURTURING MINDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION FIRST HOUSING GROUP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…The Philadelphia Foun…Lincoln Financial Fou…Charities Aid Foundat…Connelly FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…Verizon FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Aetna Foundation IncAmerican Endowment Fo…The Pfizer Foundation…
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New JerseyPA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Connelly Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McAndrews Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McAndrews Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Autism Delaware Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McAndrews Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home