Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Matz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$122kRecreation & Sports$92kArts & Culture$69kHuman Services$23kEnvironment$16kAnimals$12kHealth$11kEducation$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$912k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Virginia$20,000
Christ Church$17,000
Tudor Place$14,500
LARCHE$12,000
Order of St John$2,000
Bishop Walker School$2,000
Georgetown Garden Club$1,200
Virginia Theological Seminary$1,000
Jubilee Jobs$1,000
Metropolitan Club Preservation FD$1,000
St Johns Church$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LARCHE: $12k → 14%LARCHE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$293k · 16 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
21

Total granted

$293k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

69%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TUDOR PLACE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $36k · revenue +37%
  • LI
    LARCHE Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $22k · revenue +24%
  • CW
    City Wildlife Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +11%
  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH PARISH OF GEORGETOWN
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • BF
    Brogden Family Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
2
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
3
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
4
Federal City Council

The mission of the federal city council is to focus the creativity, talent and resources of washington dc's business and civic leaders on washington, dc's biggest challenges and opportunities.

—
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
7
Washington Chapter of the American Institute of Architects

We empower our members, profession, and community to advance the value of architecture and design in washington dc.

—
8
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
9
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
10
The Georgetown Trust
Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Club of America; the most unlike its peers is The Philanthropic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST CHURCH: $99,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCHUniversity of Virginia: $70,000 · OtherUniversity of VirginiaTUDOR PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 · OtherTUDOR PLACE FOUNDATION INCTudor Place: $22,000 · OtherTudor PlaceCHRIST CHURCH PARISH OF GEORGETOWN: $18,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH PARISH OF GEORGETOWNBrogden Family Foundation: $10,000 · Other+22 more: $30,600 · Other+22 moreVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationVIRGINIA ST…City Wildlife Inc: $11,000 · EducationCity Wildli…WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $5,000 · EducationWASHINGTON …+1 more: $1,000 · EducationLARCHE Inc: $22,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery of Art: $4,000 · Arts & CulturePRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM: $6,200 · HealthGEORGETOWN GARDEN CLUB: $4,200 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA: $1,000 · EnvironmentJUBILEE JOBS INC: $3,000 · Employment
Other$285,100Education$37,000Human Services$22,000Arts & Culture$9,000Health$6,200Environment$5,200Employment$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTUDOR PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLARCHE Inc: $22,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCity Wildlife Inc: $11,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM: $6,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN GARDEN CLUB: $4,200 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUBILEE JOBS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN MINISTRY CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AFGHAN STRAY ANIMAL LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TUDOR PLACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LARCHE Inc ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds City Wildlife Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN GARDEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE JOBS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE AFGHAN STRAY ANIMAL LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Porter Family Charitable Foundation · Thomas Rutherfoord Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust · United Way of the National Capital Area · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Matz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Matz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Matz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Matz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph