Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mary E & Michael Blevins Charitable Trust

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2019
13
Grants FY2019
9
States reached
$500
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of THE MARY E & MICHAEL BLEVINS CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COALITION FOR LIFE$500
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION$495
BROADER VISION SCHOOLS IN AFRICA INC$300
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE FOR LIFE$100
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS$50
FEED THE CHILDREN$50
ST VINCENT FERRER FOUNDATION$50
FATIMA CENTER$50
FOOD FOR THE POOR$50
MARIANS OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION$50
SACRED HEART SOUTHERN MISSIONS$50
HAWK POINT FOOD PANTRY$32
AMERICA NEEDS FATIMA$10
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COALITION FOR LIFE: $800 → 11%COALITION FOR LIFE: $600 → 11%COALITION FOR LIFE: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
MO
VA
DC
OK
MS
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14k · 13 repeat orgs$627 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +162% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$14k
$435

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+162%
+26%

Still filing today

46%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $192 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    COALITION LIFE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +182%
  • BV
    BROADER VISIONS FOR SCHOOLS IN AFRICA I
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +26%
  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $550 · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2017 · $250
  • MO
    MISSION OBLATES (OBLATE MISSIONARY SOCIETY INC)
    one grant, 2017 · $70
  • LI
    Lifesitenewscom Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $65 · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Faith Network
Human Services
2
Faithful America

The largest online community of christians putting faith into action for social justice. continued on schedule o

Civil Rights
3
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
4
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
5
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
6
Family Research Council

The family research council's primary exempt purpose is to reaffirm and promote nationally, and particularly in washington, dc, the traditional family unit and the judeo-christian value system upon which it is built. frc's activities in…

Human Services
7
The Institute On Religion and Public Life Inc

The institute on religion and public life is an interreligious, nonpartisan research and educational 501(c)(3) organization. the institute's mission is to articulate a governing consensus that supports: (see schedule o)- a religiously…

8
Red Letter Christians

Staying true to the foundation of combining jesus and justice, red letter christians mobilizes individuals into a movement of believers who live out jesus' counter-cultural teachings.

Religion
9
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
10
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
11
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
12
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Our Lady of Guadalupe for Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION — $5,736 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTIONSACRED HEART SOUTHERN MISSIONS — $925 · OtherSACRED HEART SOUTHERN MISSIONSFATIMA CENTER — $705 · OtherFATIMA CENTERMARIAN FATHERS OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION OF THE BVM — $650 · OtherMARIAN FATHERS OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION OF THE BVMINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC — $550 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INCST BARNABAS — $532 · Other+8 more — $917 · Other+8 moreCOALITION LIFE — $1,900 · Human ServicesCOALITION LIFEFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $575 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $575 · InternationalBROADER VISIONS FOR SCHOOLS IN AFRICA I — $1,100 · EducationST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $400 · Arts & CultureOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE FOR LIFE — $100 · Civil RightsTHE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC — $10 · Religion
Other$10,015Human Services$1,900International$1,150Education$1,100Arts & Culture$400Civil Rights$100Religion$10

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOALITION LIFE — $1,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROADER VISIONS FOR SCHOOLS IN AFRICA I — $1,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $575 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $575 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC — $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC — $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COALITION LIFE
  • Who funds BROADER VISIONS FOR SCHOOLS IN AFRICA I
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC
  • Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE FOR LIFE
  • Who funds Lifesitenewscom Inc
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR A CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mary E & Michael Blevins Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mary E & Michael Blevins Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Mary E & Michael Blevins Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph