Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Marmor Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$654k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.9MEducation$1.4MHealth$423kPhilanthropy$50kInternational$42kCivil Rights$42kPublic Benefit$41kReligion$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $128k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $212k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $267k
  • $250k+1 grant · $654k
$7,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cantor Center for Visual Arts$653,550
Philharmonia Baroque Orchestra$166,668
Stanford University$100,000
New Venture Fund$25,000
New Venture Fund$25,000
Voter Participation Center$25,000
The American Independent Foundation$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
San Francisco General Hospital Fdn$20,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of Am$12,000
TheaterWorks$10,000
Cantor Center for Visual Arts$10,000
Cantor Center for Visual Arts$10,000
Philharmonia Baroque Orchestra$10,000
VoteRiders$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Lighthouse for the Blind: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of The Marmor Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 84%.

The Marmor Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 37 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
3

Total granted

$2.4M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+202%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthCivil RightsEducationInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $72k · revenue +43%
  • V
    VOTERIDERS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $58k · revenue +951%
  • TS
    THEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • SU
    Stanford University Medical School
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SF
    San Francisco General Hospital Foun
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • LF
    LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIREDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +202%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
2
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
3
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Performances Inc

SFP presents internationally acclaimed and emerging performing artists, introduces innovative programs, and builds new and diversified audiences for the arts through education and outreach activities.

Arts & Culture
5
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
6
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
7
The Stanford Theatre Foundation
—
8
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
9
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
10
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
11
The Lab Sf

The lab gives significant funding, time, and space to traditionally underrepresented artists. we seek to transform alongside artistic practices in order to engage meaningfully with visionary communities whose economic and cultural…

—
12
San Francisco Art Studio Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Symphony; the most unlike its peers is Art Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cantor Center for Visual Arts: $1,269,750 · OtherCantor Center for Visual ArtsStanford University Medical School: $100,000 · OtherStanford University Medical School+21 more: $327,500 · Other+21 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,365,750 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STA…+1 more: $30,000 · EducationPHILHARMONIA BAROQUE ORCHESTRA & CHORALE: $233,168 · Arts & CulturePHILHARMONIA B…THEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATREWORKS S…SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $46,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO …FINE ARTS MUSEUMS FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Arts & CultureFINE ARTS MUSE…THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $36,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF …ART FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Arts & CultureART FOUNDATIONSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO …National Film Preservation Foundation: $22,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $11,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $95,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $72,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $30,000 · HealthGlobal Strategies: $15,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $12,000 · HealthTHE ARVO FOUNDATION FOR EYE RESEARCH INC: $8,000 · HealthVOTERIDERS: $57,500 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $25,000 · Civil RightsNEW VENTURE FUND: $50,000 · EnvironmentVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $27,000 · International
Other$1,697,250Education$1,395,750Arts & Culture$523,668Health$232,000Civil Rights$82,500Environment$50,000International$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,365,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHILHARMONIA BAROQUE ORCHESTRA & CHORALE: $233,168 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $72,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVOTERIDERS: $57,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $46,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFINE ARTS MUSEUMS FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $36,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetART FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LONG NOW FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Film Preservation Foundation: $22,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Strategies: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUST DETENTION INTERNATIONAL: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOPERA SAN JOSE INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARVO FOUNDATION FOR EYE RESEARCH INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES OF MUSIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PHILHARMONIA BAROQUE ORCHESTRA & CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds VOTERIDERS ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds THEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds FINE ARTS MUSEUMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds THE LONG NOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds National Film Preservation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Global Strategies ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds JUST DETENTION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds OPERA SAN JOSE INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William & Flora Hewlett FoundationCA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marmor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marmor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marmor Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Marmor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marmor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph