Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Markus Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$126kHuman Services$43kHealth$39kInternational$35kEducation$15kFood & Nutrition$5kAnimals$4kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$625
Median grant
10
States reached
$707k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTGATE CHURCH$10,048
HEART TRUST INC$2,500
MOBILE HOPE$2,500
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$2,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,700
SMILE TRAIN$1,500
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
INTERFAITH OUTREACHCOMMUNITY PARTNERS$1,000
MERCY SHIPS$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$800
DUCKS UNLIMITED$625
METRO MEALS ON WHEELS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%OPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $575 → 8%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$249k · 36 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
41

Total granted

$249k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+32%

Still filing today

56%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    Mobile Hope
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +710%
  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +58%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • WE
    Wayzata Evangical Free Church
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • PH
    Project Hope
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
7
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
8
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
12
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTGATE CHURCH: $90,898 · OtherWESTGATE CHURCHWounded Warriors: $13,500 · OtherWounded WarriorsCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $13,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESMiscellaneous: $11,030 · OtherWayzata Evangical Free Church: $11,000 · OtherINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $11,000 · Other+58 more: $61,426 · Other+58 moreMobile Hope: $16,544 · ReligionMobile Ho…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $8,950 · ReligionSAMARITAN…+1 more: $103 · ReligionHEART TRUST INC: $13,750 · HealthMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,650 · Health+3 more: $600 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,950 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $5,250 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,500 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $1,000 · InternationalSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,500 · EducationGifts for Seniors: $2,000 · EducationMETRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $2,602 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $1,050 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionLeadership Institute: $1,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $250 · Public Benefit
Other$211,854Religion$25,597Health$21,000International$17,700Education$10,500Food & Nutrition$3,752Public Benefit$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMobile Hope: $16,544 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetHEART TRUST INC: $13,750 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $8,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $5,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $4,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $3,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $2,602 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGifts for Seniors: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $1,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFLAMING PINE YOUTH CAMP: $1,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING HOMES FOR HEROES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN MINISTRIES: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUREPSP INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mobile Hope ↗
  • Who funds HEART TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Gifts for Seniors ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLAMING PINE YOUTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING HOMES FOR HEROES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The US Charitable Gift TrustMA11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The US Charitable Gift Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Markus Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Markus Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Markus Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Markus Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Markus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph