Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Maloney Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2020
11
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

86% of The Maloney Family Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Maloney Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $151k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
17
6
18
7
19
7
20
4
21
4
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Philanthropy$544kEducation$371kRecreation & Sports$155kHealth$113kArts & Culture$51kInternational$25kSocial Science$25kScience & Tech$11kOther$0
02FY2020 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL$50,000
RAND CORPORATION$25,000
TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$25,000
ARTLAB21 FOUNDATION$20,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$10,000
TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$10,000
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RHODES SCHOLARS$5,000
HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL$3,000
CATO INSTITUTE$1,000
JOHN M LANGSTON BAR ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES INC$1,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILD BRIDGE INC: $3k → 18%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$667k · 11 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$667k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+99%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $242k · revenue +21%
  • NB
    NATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION FUND
    2× · 2018–2019 · $60k · revenue +55%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RHODES SCHOLARS
    5× · 2018–2022 · $16k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • EC
    EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +863%
  • HC
    HARVARD COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
4
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
5
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

7
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
10
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
11
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edward Charles Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
18/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $533,722 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMTRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY — $155,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVER…YALE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYTHE UCLA FOUNDATION Mattel Children's Hospital UC — $45,500 · OtherTHE UCLA FOUNDATION Mattel C…AMERICAN TRUST FBO OXFORD UNIVERSITY — $18,000 · OtherAMERICAN TRUST FBO OXFORD UN…PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital — $14,000 · Other+10 more — $50,500 · Other+10 moreHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $241,900 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOO…UCLA FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONARTLAB21 FOUNDATION ESMOA — $50,500 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RHODES SCHOLARS — $16,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION FUND — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Rand Corporation — $25,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE — $7,000 · Public BenefitEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesCHILD BRIDGE INC — $3,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$533,722Other$333,000Education$256,900Arts & Culture$67,000Housing & Shelter$60,000Public Benefit$32,000Human Services$28,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $533,722 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $241,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION FUND — $60,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetARTLAB21 FOUNDATION ESMOA — $50,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RHODES SCHOLARS — $16,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital — $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRINCE OF WALES FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPREMIER WATER POLO CLUB — $9,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSpace for Giants USA Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD BRIDGE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPIH Health Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOHN M LANGSTON BAR ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTejon Ranch Conservancy — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Maloney Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph