Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Makray Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2026still arriving
25
Grants FY2026still arriving
8
States reached
$166k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Religion$2.0MAnimals$1.3MPhilanthropy$1.2MHealth$980kCommunity Improvement$370kEducation$343kRecreation & Sports$140kHousing & Shelter$125kOther$0
02FY2026 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $936k
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER$166,000
MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$100,000
RON HUTCHCRAFT MINISTRIES INC$100,000
THE ORCHARD CHURCH$100,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$100,000
CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION (CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL)$90,000
POINT BLUE CONSERVATION SCIENCE$80,000
CULTURE CITY CHURCH$50,000
GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK$50,000
WORLDPARTNERS FOUNDATION$50,000
INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION$50,000
THE CLIMATE CENTER$30,000
AMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN$30,000
KUKIO HOOMANA FUND$25,000
WILDCARE INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $8k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $7k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $6k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $5k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $4k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $3k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $2k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
WI
MA
CA
AZ
AR
SC
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 29 repeat orgs$543k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
14

Total granted

$5.9M
$423k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+22%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationReligionPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER
    10× · 2017–2026 · $1.1M · revenue +94% · 37% of their budget
  • PR
    POINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY
    9× · 2017–2026 · $690k · revenue +158%
  • INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2026 · $505k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • OT
    OPEN THE BIBLEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +34%
  • SA
    SONOMA ACADEMY
    one grant, 2025 · $72k · revenue 0%
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA & NORTHERN NEVADA
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
3
The Seven Hills School

The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.

—
4
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
5
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
6
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
7
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
12
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coaching Corps; the most unlike its peers is Golden Bridges School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $920,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONORCHARD CHURCH: $525,000 · OtherORCHARD CHURCHWORLDPARTNERS FOUNDATION: $225,000 · OtherWORLDPARTNERS FOUNDATIONCULTURE CITY CHURCH INC: $200,000 · OtherCULTURE CITY CHURCH INCVICTORY OUTREACH CHURCH OF CHICAGOLAND: $160,000 · OtherVICTORY OUTREACH CHURCH OF CHICAGOLANDLEADERSHIP RESOURCES: $145,000 · OtherMAUI HOMEWARD BOUND INC: $125,000 · OtherWILDCARE: $100,000 · Other+19 more: $458,000 · Other+19 morePOINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY: $690,000 · AnimalsPOINT REYES BIRD OBS…INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $505,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CRANE …+1 more: $10,000 · AnimalsBIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER: $1,116,000 · PhilanthropyBIBLICAL COUNSELING…KUKIO HOOMANA FUND: $45,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $9,320 · PhilanthropyThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $375,000 · EducationThe Moody Bi…The Climate Center: $105,000 · EducationThe Climate …NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationNORTH PARK U…SONOMA ACADEMY: $72,000 · EducationSONOMA ACADE…MILLENNIUM SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $43,000 · EducationMILLENNIUM S…+3 more: $50,000 · Education+3 moreHUTCHCRAFT MINISTRIES INC: $350,000 · ReligionHUTCHCRAFT…GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $150,000 · ReligionGLOBAL TRA…OPEN THE BIBLE: $100,000 · ReligionOPEN THE B…+1 more: $10,000 · ReligionAMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL LINKS TRUST: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $90,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$2,858,000Animals$1,205,000Philanthropy$1,170,320Education$745,000Religion$610,000Arts & Culture$100,000Membership Benefit$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER: $1,116,000 over 10y, 37% of budgetPOINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY: $690,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $505,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $375,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUTCHCRAFT MINISTRIES INC: $350,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Climate Center: $105,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWILDCARE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN THE BIBLE: $100,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSONOMA ACADEMY: $72,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN: $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL LINKS TRUST: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKUKIO HOOMANA FUND: $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMILLENNIUM SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $43,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAYCARE INC: $36,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetPRESIDIO KNOLLS SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOACHING CORPS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN BRIDGES SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJameson Animal Rescue Ranch: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION: $9,320 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds HUTCHCRAFT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Climate Center ↗
  • Who funds WILDCARE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OPEN THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LINKS TRUST ↗
  • Who funds KUKIO HOOMANA FUND ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY DAYCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDIO KNOLLS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COACHING CORPS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY15.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Makray Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Makray Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Makray Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph