Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Macbea Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$7.0MFood & Nutrition$2.4MReligion$1.6MHealth$1.4MHousing & Shelter$1.1MHuman Services$1.0MEducation$791kYouth Development$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $551k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAR HOUSE$500,000
ST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC CHURCH$500,000
COLUMBUS FOUNDATION$250,000
COLUMBUS FOUNDATION$200,000
COLUMBUS FOUNDATION$100,000
COLUMBUS FOUNDATION$100,000
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO$100,000
COLUMBUS FOUNDATION$100,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$100,000
MID OHIO FOOD COLLECTIVE$60,000
HOLY FAMILY SOUP KITCHEN$50,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES$50,000
SAINT JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$50,000
WARM$50,000
ST FRANCIS CENTER$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $213k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VETERANS AND FIRST RESPONDERS: $10k → 9%LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF CARE: $15k → 10%BIG WALNUT FRIENDS WHO SHARE: $14k → 5%BIG WALNUT FRIENDS WHO SHARE: $8k → 5%BIG WALNUT FRIENDS WHO SHARE: $8k → 5%BIG WALNUT FRIENDS WHO SHARE: $8k → 5%BIG WALNUT FRIENDS WHO SHARE: $6k → 5%HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%CHARITY NEWSIES: $10k → 15%FAMILIES FLOURISH: $19k → 15%PREGNANCY DECISION HEALTH CENTERS: $31k → 15%PREGNANCY DECISION HEALTH CENTERS: $10k → 15%PREGNANCY DECISION HEALTH CENTERS: $8k → 15%PREGNANCY DECISION HEALTH CENTERS: $8k → 15%PREGNANCY DECISION HEALTH CENTERS: $8k → 15%GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $20k → 15%GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of The Macbea Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 92%.

The Macbea Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 48 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
28

Total granted

$8.0M
$829k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+12%

Still filing today

54%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $196k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    STAR HOUSE
    3× · 2021–2025 · $750k · revenue +98%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $450k · revenue +112%
  • MF
    Mid-Ohio Foodbank
    9× · 2017–2025 · $390k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF LOURDES CATHOLIC CHRUCH
    one grant, 2024 · $135k
  • MS
    MEN'S SHELTER OF DELAWARE COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
2
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
3
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
4
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
5
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
6
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
7
West Ohio Food Bank

Everyone should have access to healthy, nutritious food. Together with our partners, we provide nutritious food to those in need. We do this through collaborating with more than 100 partner agencies, which include emergency pantries, soup…

Food & Nutrition
8
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
9
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
10
OhioGuidestone

To provide pathways for growth, achievement, and lifelong success.

Health
11
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services
12
Jewish Family Services

To help individuals and families achieve economic self-sufficiency and emotional stability.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Directions for Youth and Families Inc; the most unlike its peers is Harvest Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
34/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $6,675,000 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBUS FOUNDATIONSTAR HOUSE: $750,000 · PhilanthropySTAR HOUSE+3 more: $130,000 · PhilanthropyST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1,100,000 · OtherST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC CHURCHLUTHERAN SOCIETY SERVICES: $475,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIETY SERVICESMid-Ohio Foodbank: $390,000 · OtherMid-Ohio FoodbankST FRANCIS CENTER: $340,000 · OtherST FRANCIS CENTERWARM: $320,000 · OtherTHE JAMES DEVELOPMENT FUND: $300,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY SOUP KITCHEN: $290,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL: $224,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $215,000 · Other+46 more: $2,521,594 · Other+46 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $450,000 · EducationWestfall CARES: $114,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Education+1 more: $20,000 · EducationLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $270,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $135,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $25,500 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $155,000 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $100,000 · HealthThe Eye Cancer Foundation Inc: $50,000 · HealthCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF COLUMBUS: $74,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY DECISION HEALTH CENTERS: $65,000 · Human ServicesBIG WALNUT FRIENDS WHO SHARE: $44,000 · Human ServicesGLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $40,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FLOURISH INC: $19,200 · Human ServicesLICKING CO COALITION OF CARE: $15,000 · Human ServicesOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE VETERANS AND FIRST RESPONDERS: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $210,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF DELAWARE COUNTY: $40,000 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$7,555,000Other$6,175,594Education$684,000Food & Nutrition$430,500Health$305,000Human Services$292,200Housing & Shelter$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $6,675,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSTAR HOUSE: $750,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $390,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $270,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $210,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $155,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOWER LIGHT MINISTRIES INC: $140,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $135,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetREFUGE INC: $120,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetWestfall CARES: $114,000 over 6y, 45% of budgetTOGETHER WE GROW INC: $110,000 over 9y, 8.7% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $100,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFLAT ROCK HOMES INC: $85,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF COLUMBUS: $74,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC: $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY DECISION HEALTH CENTERS: $65,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetLITTLE BOTTOMS FREE STORE: $55,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetELIZABETH'S HOPE PREGNANCY RESOURCES: $45,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetBIG WALNUT FRIENDS WHO SHARE: $44,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetGLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF DELAWARE COUNTY: $40,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetEPILEPSY ALLIANCE OHIO: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM OF OHIO: $35,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetHILLSBORO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILIES FLOURISH INC: $19,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSID PUBLIC SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLICKING CO COALITION OF CARE: $15,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetMASH and Resource Center: $12,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE VETERANS AND FIRST RESPONDERS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGREENE COUNTY FISH PANTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJORDAN RIESER LEGACY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetUnited Church Residences of Delaware: $6,880 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STAR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWER LIGHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Westfall CARES ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE GROW INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds FLAT ROCK HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF COLUMBUS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY DECISION HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BOTTOMS FREE STORE ↗
  • Who funds The Eye Cancer Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH37.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Siemer Family Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Margaret and Robert Walter Foundation · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Park National Corporation Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Macbea Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Macbea Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Macbea’s filings →

    More from the funding graph