· Public charity
Margaret and Robert Walter Foundation
The walter family foundation is a supporting organization of the columbus foundation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k18 grants · $403k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $875k
- $250k+6 grants · $5.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST CHARLES PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $3,048,000 |
| STAR HOUSE | $1,000,000 |
| ST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH | $625,000 |
| MEUSE FAMILY FOUNDATION | $525,000 |
| HARMONY PROJECT PRODUCTIONS INC | $300,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES | $250,000 |
| HOME FOR FAMILIES | $160,000 |
| COMMUNITY FINANCIAL WELLNESS | $125,000 |
| FLYING HORSE FARMS | $125,000 |
| COLUMBUS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ADAPTIVE SPORTS CONNECTION | $80,000 |
| MARY'S MEALS USA INC | $75,000 |
| LAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF LAWRENCE MASSACHUSETTS | $60,000 |
| COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART | $50,000 |
| GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The Ohio University Foundation4× · 2018–2021 · $4.0M · revenue +97%- USUNITED SCHOOLS3× · 2020–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +62% · 96% of their budget
- OSOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +45%
Funded once
- MEMETRO EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $750k · revenue +26%
- EHENTITLEMENTS HOW INCone grant, 2022 · $450k · revenue -17%
- DFDIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INCone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To provide health and wellness services without geographic restriction.
Inspiring life journeys
Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.
Enhance the lives of all residents of greater cleveland, now and for generations to come, by working together with our donors to build community endowment, address needs through grantmaking, and provide leadership on key community issues.
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary's Meals Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNITED SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION OF THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF COLUMBUS ↗
- Who funds STAR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CHILDHOOD LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLUMBUS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds METRO EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds DAMASCUS INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds MEUSE FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ENTITLEMENTS HOW INC ↗
- Who funds HARMONY PROJECT PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds KENYA WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds REEB AVENUE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS CONNECTION CORDER ↗
- Who funds FLYING HORSE FARMS ↗
- Who funds THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KINDWAY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FINANCIAL WELLNESS ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORK GROUP ↗
- Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
- Who funds I KNOW I CAN ↗
- Who funds TENACRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Siemer Family Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Cardinal Health Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Meuse Family Foundation · Encova Foundation of Ohio · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Columbus Jewish Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Margaret and Robert Walter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Atlantic White Shark Conservancy Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Margaret and Robert Walter Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Margaret and Robert Walter Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.