Skip to content
The Luke and Becky Corbett Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Luke and Becky Corbett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$313k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MReligion$555kPhilanthropy$412kArts & Culture$212kEducation$203kHuman Services$67kCommunity Improvement$45kRecreation & Sports$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Integris Health Foundation$150,000
NEW COVENANT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$37,500
Curbside Enterprises$35,000
United Way of Central Oklahoma$30,000
Special Care Inc$30,000
Center of Family Love$10,000
Hope Center of Edmond$5,000
Last Frontier Council - BSOA$2,500
Allied Arts of Oklahoma Inc$2,500
Shine Foundation Inc$2,500
OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME$2,500
New Horizons Foundation$1,500
Tunnels to Towers Foundation$1,500
NewView Oklahoma$1,000
OKLAHOMA SPORT HALL OF FAME$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $274k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%Center of Family Love: $78k → 9%Center of Family Love: $30k → 9%Center of Family Love: $11k → 9%HIS PURPOSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%Center of Family Love: $10k → 9%Center of Family Love: $10k → 9%American Indian Cultural Center Foundation: $33k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $1k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $500 → 16%American Indian Cultural Center Foundation: $50k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $12k → 16%Special Care Inc: $30k → 16%Hope Center of Edmond: $5k → 16%Hope Center of Edmond: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 20 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$2.5M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+25%

Still filing today

70%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $396k · revenue +13%
  • TC
    The Center of Family Love
    5× · 2021–2025 · $139k · revenue +32%
  • OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BC
    BETHANY CHILDREN HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +174%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +103%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Osteopathic Founders Foundation

The mission of the osteopathic founders foundation is to support osteopathic medical education, to enhance the public's understanding of osteopathic medicine, and to improve the health of the community through projects consistent with the…

Health
2
Oklahoma State University Foundation

Unite donor passions with university priorities to elevate the impact of oklahoma state university.

Education
3
Dean Mcgee Eye Institute

The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.

Health
4
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
5
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Oklahoma State University Alumni Association

The mission of the oklahoma state alumni association is to deepen the love and pride for oklahoma state university by serving its members, alumni, students, faculty and staff by intentional and innovative programming that engages members…

Education
9
Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce Inc

The voice of business and the visionary organization in the greater oklahoma city region.

—
10
Oklahoma Optometric Association

The oklahoma association of optometric physicians is a professional association dedicated to advocacy, education, and other resources for oklahoma optometric physicians. mission statement: unite. empower. advocate.

—
11
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is His Purpose Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $850,000 · HealthINTEGRIS Health Foundation IncNEW COVENANT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $554,700 · OtherNEW COVENANT UNITED METHODIST C…BETHANY CHILDREN HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 · OtherBETHANY CHILDREN HEALTH CENTERCURBSIDE ENTERPRISES INC: $35,000 · Other+11 more: $70,025 · Other+11 moreUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $396,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Cen…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Center of Family Love: $139,000 · Human ServicesThe Center of…FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $83,333 · Human ServicesFIRST AMERICA…HOPE CENTER OF EDMOND INC: $52,500 · Human ServicesHOPE CENTER O…SPECIAL CARE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL CARE …NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $12,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $136,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $7,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $105,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $21,250 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureEDMOND CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $32,500 · Crime & LegalCOMMITTEE OF 100 OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Crime & Legal
Health$850,000Other$759,725Philanthropy$406,000Human Services$319,333Education$203,000Arts & Culture$128,750Crime & Legal$39,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $850,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $396,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetThe Center of Family Love: $139,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $136,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $83,333 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetHOPE CENTER OF EDMOND INC: $52,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDMOND CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $32,500 over 4y, 85% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $21,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE OF 100 OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIS PURPOSE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDMOND MEMORIAL ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Fidelity Fou…Inasmuch FoundationRainbolt Family Found…Cresap Family Foundat…El and Thelma Gaylord…Communities Foundatio…Fred Jones Family Fou…Crowe & Dunlevy Found…The Merrick FoundationOne Gas Foundation IncArvest FoundationPresbyterian Health F…
American Fidelity FoundationOK32.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Presbyterian Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Luke and Becky Corbett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Luke and Becky Corbett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • First Americans Museum Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Luke and Becky Corbett’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home