· Private foundation
Presbyterian Health Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRANTS APPROVED FOR FUTURE PAYMENT | $19,500,000 |
| GRANTS PAID DURING THE YEAR | $8,969,342 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation2× · 2021–2022 · $5.1M · revenue +9%- OCOKLAHOMA CITY INNOVATION DISTRICT INC2× · 2021–2022 · $203k · revenue ×12
- UWUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $160k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- GPGRANTS PMTS APPROVED FOR FUTURE PAYone grant, 2023 · $560k
- OPOMRF/MD/PHD Programone grant, 2022 · $327k
- OPOUHSC/MD/PHD Programone grant, 2022 · $327k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…
Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.
The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)
Serving the needs of the whole child, including education, safety, environment, health, and well-being.
The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.
The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.
Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Chance to Change Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY INNOVATION DISTRICT INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Blood Institute ↗
- Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
- Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Mothers Milk Bank ↗
- Who funds A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN MISSION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inasmuch Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Cresap Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Bowen Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Rainbolt Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Presbyterian Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Presbyterian Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.