Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Luke and Becky Corbett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$313k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.1MReligion$555kPhilanthropy$412kArts & Culture$212kEducation$203kHuman Services$67kCommunity Improvement$45kRecreation & Sports$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Integris Health Foundation$150,000
NEW COVENANT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$37,500
Curbside Enterprises$35,000
United Way of Central Oklahoma$30,000
Special Care Inc$30,000
Center of Family Love$10,000
Hope Center of Edmond$5,000
OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME$2,500
Last Frontier Council - BSOA$2,500
Allied Arts of Oklahoma Inc$2,500
Shine Foundation Inc$2,500
Tunnels to Towers Foundation$1,500
New Horizons Foundation$1,500
NewView Oklahoma$1,000
OKLAHOMA SPORT HALL OF FAME$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $274k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%Center of Family Love: $78k → 9%Center of Family Love: $30k → 9%Center of Family Love: $11k → 9%HIS PURPOSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%Center of Family Love: $10k → 9%Center of Family Love: $10k → 9%American Indian Cultural Center Foundation: $33k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $1k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $500 → 16%American Indian Cultural Center Foundation: $50k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $12k → 16%Special Care Inc: $30k → 16%Hope Center of Edmond: $5k → 16%Hope Center of Edmond: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 20 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$2.5M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+25%

Still filing today

70%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $396k · revenue +13%
  • TC
    The Center of Family Love
    5× · 2021–2025 · $139k · revenue +32%
  • OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BC
    BETHANY CHILDREN HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +174%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Osteopathic Founders Foundation

The mission of the osteopathic founders foundation is to support osteopathic medical education, to enhance the public's understanding of osteopathic medicine, and to improve the health of the community through projects consistent with the…

Health
2
Oklahoma State University Foundation

Unite donor passions with university priorities to elevate the impact of oklahoma state university.

Education
3
Dean Mcgee Eye Institute

The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.

Health
4
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

5
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Oklahoma State University Alumni Association

The mission of the oklahoma state alumni association is to deepen the love and pride for oklahoma state university by serving its members, alumni, students, faculty and staff by intentional and innovative programming that engages members…

Education
9
Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce Inc

The voice of business and the visionary organization in the greater oklahoma city region.

10
Oklahoma Optometric Association

The oklahoma association of optometric physicians is a professional association dedicated to advocacy, education, and other resources for oklahoma optometric physicians. mission statement: unite. empower. advocate.

11
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is His Purpose Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEarly Childhood & Youth Ser…Food Insecurity & Homelessn…Faith-Based SchoolsArts & Cultural Organizatio…Legal Advocacy & Justice Re…Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Development ProgramsCommunity Health Care Provi…Arts and History MuseumsOklahoma City Philanthropic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%9%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr14%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr14%54%35–55yr14%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
14%
1,352/9,432

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc — $850,000 · HealthINTEGRIS Health Foundation IncNEW COVENANT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $554,700 · OtherNEW COVENANT UNITED METHODIST C…BETHANY CHILDREN HEALTH CENTER — $100,000 · OtherBETHANY CHILDREN HEALTH CENTERCURBSIDE ENTERPRISES INC — $35,000 · Other+11 more — $70,025 · Other+11 moreUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc — $396,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Cen…+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Center of Family Love — $139,000 · Human ServicesThe Center of…FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $83,333 · Human ServicesFIRST AMERICA…HOPE CENTER OF EDMOND INC — $52,500 · Human ServicesHOPE CENTER O…SPECIAL CARE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL CARE …NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC — $12,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $136,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $7,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $105,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME — $21,250 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $2,500 · Arts & CultureEDMOND CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $32,500 · Crime & LegalCOMMITTEE OF 100 OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Crime & Legal
Health$850,000Other$759,725Philanthropy$406,000Human Services$319,333Education$203,000Arts & Culture$128,750Crime & Legal$39,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc — $850,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc — $396,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetThe Center of Family Love — $139,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $136,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $83,333 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetHOPE CENTER OF EDMOND INC — $52,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDMOND CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $32,500 over 4y, 85% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME — $21,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE OF 100 OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHIS PURPOSE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDMOND MEMORIAL ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Fidelity FoundationOK32.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Presbyterian Health Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Luke and Becky Corbett Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 150%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc45% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation1% of income from government
  • First Americans Museum Foundation1% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph