· Private foundation
Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k50 grants · $130k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Norman Regional Health Foundation | $15,000 |
| Neighborhood Services Organization | $10,000 |
| Oklahoma City University School of Law | $9,500 |
| Historical Society of the USCD Western District | $8,334 |
| Oklahoma City National Memorial & Museum | $7,500 |
| Oklahoma University Foundation INc | $5,600 |
| Tulsa Historical Society and Museum | $5,000 |
| Allied Arts Foundation | $5,000 |
| Federal Bar Association | $5,000 |
| American Heart Association | $5,000 |
| The University of Tulsa College of Law | $4,000 |
| Alzheimer's Association | $4,000 |
| Texas A&M Foundation | $3,500 |
| Courage Thru Cancer Inc | $3,000 |
| The Center for Individuals with Physical Disabilities | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +38%
TULSA AREA UNITED WAY5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +12%- OCOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +26%
Funded once
LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +78%- UOUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -121%
- WDWestern District of Oklahoma Historical Societyone grant, 2024 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.
The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.
Oklahoma indian legal services is dedicated to representation where federal indian, tribal and treaty law arise. oils is a nonprofit corporation primarily funded by the legal services corporation (lsc). establisehd in 1981, its purpose is…
Oklahoma contemporary arts center encourages artistic expression in all its forms through education,exhibitions, and performance.
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
To promote ethical conduct among attorneys, to advance the effective administration of our judicial system, to ensure equal access to justice for all citizens and to engender respect for the legal profession, the law and the governing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Oklahoma City Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dillingham Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TULSA CASA INC ↗
- Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NEXUS EQUINE INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE THRIVE ↗
- Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
- Who funds TULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA SHAKESPEARE IN THE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Fidelity Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pawnee Nation College — 75% of income from government
- Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc — 13% of income from government
- Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
- Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
- Canterbury Voices Inc — 6% of income from government
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- Ywca Tulsa Inc — 3% of income from government
- Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
- Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation — 1% of income from government
- First Americans Museum Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.