Skip to content
The Lublin-Hurowitz Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Lublin-Hurowitz Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$49kPhilanthropy$44kHealth$36kArts & Culture$12kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$10kEnvironment$2kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$272k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE SHIR SHALOM$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TEMPLE SHALOM$2,513
ARTIS NAPLES$2,500
CONGREGATION BETH AHABAH$1,535
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
FOR KIDS$750
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND$550
ALBEMARLE HIGH SCHOOL BAND$500
COLLEGIATE ANNUAL FUND$500
ARCADIA UNIVERSITY$500
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$250
FEED MORE$250
BETH AHABAH GIVING CIRCLE$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
VA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 19 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
18

Total granted

$106k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+35%

Still filing today

58%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +14%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +53%
  • FM
    FEED MORE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CT
    CRISIS TEXT LINE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -22%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • JF
    JEWISH FED OF GR NAPLES-UKRANIAN EMERG FND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
3
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
4
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
10
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $36,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INCTEMPLE SHIR SHALOM: $22,000 · OtherTEMPLE SHIR SHALOMTEMPLE SHALOM INC: $12,938 · OtherTEMPLE SHALOM INCCONGREGATION BETH AHABAH: $10,275 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH AHABAHIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FEDERATION OF RICHMOND: $6,900 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF RICHMONDIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FED OF GR NAPLES-UKRANIAN EMERG FND: $5,000 · Other+21 more: $20,095 · Other+21 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $17,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCI…CRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $10,000 · HealthCRISIS TEXT LINE INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Assoc…ARTIS-NAPLES INC: $8,200 · Arts & CultureTHE HOLOCAUST MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureFEED MORE INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationJewish Family Services Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFORKIDS INC: $750 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc: $450 · Housing & Shelter
Other$125,708Health$32,500Arts & Culture$11,300Food & Nutrition$5,000Education$3,500Human Services$2,000Housing & Shelter$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $36,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $8,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOLOCAUST MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Family Services Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORKIDS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTUCKAHOE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $280 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Fou…Jewish Federation of …Pamela J and Robert M…Kaye Family Foundatio…Renaissance Charitabl…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Ayco Charitable F…The US Charitable Gif…Raymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…
Collier Community Foundation IncFL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Pamela J and Robert M Cahners Charitable Fund · Kaye Family Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lublin-Hurowitz Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lublin-Hurowitz Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lublin-Hurowitz Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Lublin-Hurowitz Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lublin-Hurowitz’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home