· Private foundation
The Lozen Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $99k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WHITE FEATHER FARM | $1,353,197 |
| WOODSHOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION | $251,375 |
| SARA LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY | $98,753 |
| PATRICK HUBLEY UTAH FILM FESTIVAL | $29,751 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $356k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.
23 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- WFWHITE FEATHER FARM INC5× · 2021–2025 · $5.1M · revenue +36% · 79% of their budget
- WFWHITE FEATHER FOREST INC3× · 2021–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +12% · 98% of their budget
- UFUTAH FILM CENTER2× · 2019–2020 · $1.9M · revenue +105%
Funded once
- WFWhite Feather Farmone grant, 2020 · $3.8M
- GPGREAT PLAINS CONSERVATIONone grant, 2023 · $500k
FILM INDEPENDENTgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $360k · revenue +66%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.
Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…
Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
How this is measured
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHITE FEATHER FARM INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE FEATHER FOREST INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds WOODSTOCK FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES TOGETHER RELIEF ↗
- Who funds THE JEFFREY DESKOVIC FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds WEEDEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sundance Institute ↗
- Who funds CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOMA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds STOCKADE WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds AMSTERDAM NEWS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Scenic Hudson Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE PALM BEACHES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds JACK ARTS INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Lozen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lozen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
- Root Ns Inc: 26% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Lozen Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Lozen Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Lozen’s filings →