Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Logan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$539kEducation$492kInternational$73kArts & Culture$64kHealth$37kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kYouth Development$2kScience & Tech$80Other$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$2,400
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF WICHITA$75,000
THE JOURNEY CHURCH$25,000
FAITH MAPPINGS$24,000
HOLY ANGELS FOUNDATION INC$6,000
MISSION EURASIA$5,000
WHEATON COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNED GIVING$4,000
JOY ACADEMY$4,000
CHRISTIAN PERFORMANCE THEATRE INC$3,000
FIRST EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH$3,000
LEIGHTON FORD MINISTRIES$3,000
THE NAVIGATORS$2,400
THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL$2,000
HEARTLAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRY$2,000
THE OASIS MINISTRIES INC$2,000
DM STEARNS MISSIONARY FOUNDATION$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTER CITY ACADEMY: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
PA
CA
CO
AZ
KS
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 29 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+22%

Still filing today

41%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF WICHITA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $361k · revenue +188%
  • NP
    NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • CP
    CHRISTIAN PERFORMANCE THEATRE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JOURNEY WICHITA EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • CC
    CENTER CITY ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +22%
  • TO
    THE OASIS MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westminster Academy

The school provides classical christian education to students in grades junior kindergarten through twelve.

Education
2
Lakelight Institute

Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.

Religion
3
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
6
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education
7
Biblica Inc

To provide the bible in accurate, contemporary translations and formats so that more people around the world will have the opportunity to be transformed by jesus christ.

Religion
8
Christian Leaders for Africa Inc

Christian leaders from africa promotes christian theological training & education of local leaders in kenya and throughout africa. it invests in undergraduate, masters, and phd scholarships, faculty support for african professors and…

Religion
9
Central Christian College of the Bible

Central christian college of the bible (central) exists to develop servant-leaders for the church. as a traditional undergraduate bible college of the restoration movement, central equips faithful men and women for leadership ministry.

Education
10
Calvary Chapel University Inc
Education
11
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
12
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Angels Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Techsoup Global. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF WICHITA: $360,800 · EducationCLASSICAL SCHOOL OF WICHITANORTH PARK UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY+4 more: $25,000 · EducationEVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH: $86,562 · OtherEVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCHTHE JOURNEY CHURCH: $47,000 · OtherTHE JOURNEY CHURCHTHE FIRST EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF WICHITA KANSAS: $42,700 · OtherTHE FIRST EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH …Paul Carlson Medical Program Inc: $40,000 · OtherPaul Carlson Medical Program IncGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $28,270 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONALTHE JOURNEY WICHITA EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH: $16,750 · OtherDM STEARNS MISSIONARY FOUNDATION: $16,200 · Other+16 more: $92,780 · Other+16 moreFAITH MAPPINGS INC: $234,000 · ReligionFAITH MAPPINGS INCHOLY ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · ReligionHOLY ANGELS FOUNDATION IN…MISSION EURASIA: $12,500 · Religion+1 more: $8,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN PERFORMANCE THEATRE INC: $42,500 · Arts & CultureWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $4,500 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL SIGNET GROUPINC: $27,000 · InternationalHOPENET INC: $11,000 · HealthCENTER CITY ACADEMY INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $1,500 · Youth Development
Education$485,800Other$370,262Religion$275,500Arts & Culture$47,000International$27,000Health$11,000Human Services$6,500Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLASSICAL SCHOOL OF WICHITA: $360,800 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetFAITH MAPPINGS INC: $234,000 over 9y, 56% of budgetNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN PERFORMANCE THEATRE INC: $42,500 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetPaul Carlson Medical Program Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGLOBAL SIGNET GROUPINC: $27,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetHOLY ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION EURASIA: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOY ACADEMY INC: $11,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetWheaton College: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOPENET INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLeighton Ford Ministries Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER CITY ACADEMY INC: $6,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHREE CANDELABRAS: $5,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHFIELD SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTECHSOUP GLOBAL: $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF WICHITA ↗
  • Who funds FAITH MAPPINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN PERFORMANCE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Paul Carlson Medical Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SIGNET GROUPINC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY ANGELS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION EURASIA ↗
  • Who funds JOY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Wheaton College ↗
  • Who funds HOPENET INC ↗
  • Who funds Leighton Ford Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE CANDELABRAS ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHFIELD SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds TECHSOUP GLOBAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353RI18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Paul Ross Charitable Foundation · Deboer Foundation Inc · Berry Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Logan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Logan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Logan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Logan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Logan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph