Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Little Oak Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$367kReligion$271kHealth$205kPhilanthropy$101kEducation$90kHousing & Shelter$39kCrime & Legal$38kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVOCATES INC$25,000
THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION$25,000
ST DENIS CHURCH$15,000
JOHN HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN FOUNDATIO$15,000
DOMINICAN FOUNDATION DOMINICAN FRIA$15,000
THE BERKLEY FUND$10,000
UNMASK THE INVISIBLE$5,000
EPILEPSY FDN OF COLORADO AND WYOMIN$5,000
DAYSPRING PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$5,000
LIBERTY HOUSE INC$5,000
MONTROSE SCHOOL$5,000
Upper Valley Haven$5,000
ELIZABETH SETON CENTER$5,000
RCBM-SEMINARIAN FUND$5,000
ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MT
NY
MA
OR
PA
CO
MO
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 30 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+196%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ADVOCATES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +170%
  • TC
    THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $133k · revenue +145%
  • EF
    EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO
    8× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • HF
    HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +196%
  • C
    CASA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
2
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

—
7
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
10
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
11
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
12
Dana Hall School

Dana hall is an independent boarding and day school for girls in grades five through twelve.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dayspring Pregnancy Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
17/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION: $132,500 · OtherTHE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATIONDOMINICAN FOUNDATION DOMINICAN FRIA: $125,000 · OtherDOMINICAN FOUNDATION DOMINICAN FRIATHE BERKLEY FUND: $98,000 · OtherTHE BERKLEY FUNDJOHN HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN FOUNDATIO: $97,500 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN FOUNDATIOST DENIS CHURCH: $90,000 · OtherST DENIS CHURCHEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $42,500 · OtherEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF COLORADORCBM-SEMINARIAN FUND: $39,000 · Other+23 more: $157,500 · Other+23 moreADVOCATES INC: $210,000 · HealthADVOCATES INCDayspring Pregnancy Care Center: $21,000 · HealthDayspring Pregnancy Ca…MONTROSE FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $17,000 · EducationTHE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $15,500 · EducationINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF DENVER: $8,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $7,000 · EducationCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $33,000 · Civil RightsHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $5,000 · Human ServicesMEDFIELD MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$782,000Health$231,000Education$70,500Civil Rights$33,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADVOCATES INC: $210,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION: $132,500 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $42,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $33,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMONTROSE FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN: $22,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDayspring Pregnancy Care Center: $21,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetELIZABETH SETON CENTER INC: $21,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLiberty House Inc: $19,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF DENVER: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDFIELD MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetPINE HAVEN BOYS CENTER FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCOLORADO YOUNG LEADERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTROSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds Dayspring Pregnancy Care Center ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH SETON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Liberty House Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MEDFIELD MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE HAVEN BOYS CENTER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Little Oak Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Little Oak Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Advocates Inc: 66% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Horizons for Homeless Children: 21% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Little Oak Hill’s filings →

More from the funding graph