Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Li Lu Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$8.4MEducation$7.2MScience & Tech$1.3MSocial Science$1.1MInternational$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MEnvironment$518kHealth$190kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $473k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.3M
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$103M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION$2,000,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$1,002,500
ENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO$120,000
THE PARADISE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$103,098
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$100,000
COMMITTEE OF 100$50,000
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY$50,000
EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION$50,000
NYU STERN BUSINESS SCHOOL$33,400
ST THOMAS SCHOOL$31,000
NATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
MA
NV
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Li Lu Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Li Lu Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 32 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
25

Total granted

$14M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-1%

Still filing today

66%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalPublic BenefitArts & CultureHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +14%
  • EO
    ENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $900k · revenue +49%
  • PS
    POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL
    5× · 2019–2023 · $530k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • The Rand Corporation
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -1%
  • GO
    GUARDIAN OF ANGELS CHARITABLE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • HU
    HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2020 · $106k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
8
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
26/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASIAN AMERICAN EQUITY OPPORTUNITY FUND: $4,000,000 · OtherASIAN AMERICAN EQUITY OPPORTUNITY FUNDTHE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 · OtherTHE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONGUARDIAN OF ANGELS CHARITABLE FUND: $1,000,000 · OtherGUARDIAN OF ANGELS CHARITABLE FUNDCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL: $560,000 · OtherTHE PARADISE INTL FOUNDATION LTD: $516,395 · OtherCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $435,000 · Other+23 more: $1,199,700 · Other+23 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,287,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,010,809 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $530,000 · EducationPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Education+6 more: $541,000 · Education+6 moreThe Rand Corporation: $1,000,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $28,500 · Public BenefitENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE: $900,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $60,000 · International+5 more: $67,500 · InternationalAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $150,000 · Science & TechCenter for Humane Technology: $100,000 · Science & TechCOMMITTEE OF 100 INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES: $160,000 · HealthTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $45,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · Health
Other$11,711,095Education$6,669,309Public Benefit$1,028,500International$1,027,500Science & Tech$250,000Arts & Culture$240,500Health$207,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,287,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,010,809 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE: $900,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $530,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST THOMAS SCHOOL: $211,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMITTEE OF 100 INC: $200,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES: $160,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED CHINESE AMERICANS: $127,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetTEACH FOR ALL INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Humane Technology: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLISTEN FIRST PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOLARS AT RISK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SUNSHINE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE COMPANY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESCANSO GARDENS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE ↗
  • Who funds POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST THOMAS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE OF 100 INC ↗
  • Who funds THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHINESE AMERICANS ↗
  • Who funds TEACH FOR ALL INC ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Center for Humane Technology ↗
  • Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LISTEN FIRST PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN13.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California · Wm Keck Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Li Lu Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Li Lu Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Li Lu Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Li Lu Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Li Lu’s filings →

More from the funding graph