Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

The Li Lu Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2024
25
Organizations funded FY2023
36%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$2,000,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 25
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$103M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 36% of the organizations The Li Lu Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 78% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationPublic BenefitInternationalHealthScience & TechSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$2.9M9%
FY202325$4.4M36%
FY202218$1.7M0%
FY202124$3.7M13%
FY202021$2.8M33%
FY201925$906k44%
FY20188$160k38%
FY201724$316kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$8.4MEducation$7.2MScience & Tech$1.3MSocial Science$1.1MInternational$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MEnvironment$518kHealth$190kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
MA
NV
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
AL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 41 grantees
All grantees of The Li Lu Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
California Institute of Technology$1,010,80960%
The Rand Corporation$1,000,00010%
Endowment of the US Institute of Peace$900,00036%
Polytechnic School$530,00050%
University of Washington Foundation$300,00030%
St Thomas School$211,00060%
Committee of 100 Inc$200,00062%
The J David Gladstone Institutes$160,00060%
American Association for the Advancement of Science$150,00030%
Uc San Diego Foundation$150,00020%
United Chinese Americans$127,500412%
Teach for All Inc$120,00060%
Seattle University$100,00020%
Center for Humane Technology$100,00011%
Edward Charles Foundation$100,00020%
American Academy of Arts & Sciences$75,00030%
City Year Inc$65,00050%
Council on Foreign Relations Inc$60,00030%
The Aspen Institute Inc$50,00010%
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc$45,00050%
Wikimedia Foundation Inc$27,50060%
Ballet Theatre Foundation Inc$25,00010%
Listen First Project Inc$25,00013%
International Medical Corps$25,00050%
Bard College$25,00010%
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center$25,00010%
Pacific Council on International Policy$20,00040%
Scholars at Risk Inc$15,00011%
National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc$15,00010%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$10,0001n/a
Panda Cares Foundation Inc$7,5002n/a
Human Rights First$5,00010%
Chessanity Inc$5,0001n/a
Upward Bound Study Center Inc$3,0001n/a
Plus One Foundation$2,5001n/a
Human Rights Watch Inc$2,50010%
Project Sunshine Inc$2,50010%
Rocky Mountain Institute$1,00010%
Catalyst California$1,00010%
The Unusual Suspects Theatre Company$50010%
Descanso Gardens Foundation$50010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($11M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Li Lu Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCalifornia Institute of Technology: $1,010,809 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEndowment of the US Institute of Peace: $900,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetPolytechnic School: $530,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Washington Foundation: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSt Thomas School: $211,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCommittee of 100 Inc: $200,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetThe J David Gladstone Institutes: $160,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUc San Diego Foundation: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Chinese Americans: $127,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetTeach for All Inc: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSeattle University: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Humane Technology: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEdward Charles Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Academy of Arts & Sciences: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCity Year Inc: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on Foreign Relations Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Aspen Institute Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWikimedia Foundation Inc: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBallet Theatre Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetListen First Project Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetInternational Medical Corps: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBard College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Council on International Policy: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetScholars at Risk Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNational Minority Supplier Development Council Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHuman Rights First: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHuman Rights Watch Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Sunshine Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatalyst California: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Unusual Suspects Theatre Company: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDescanso Gardens Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 36.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN13.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California · Wm Keck Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Li Lu Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Li Lu Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Li Lu Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Li Lu Foundation

How much does The Li Lu Foundation give?
The Li Lu Foundation reported 12 grants totaling $3,854,998 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 25 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Li Lu Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Civil Rights (40%), Education (34%), Science & Tech (6%).
Who are The Li Lu Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: California Institute of Technology ($1.0M), The Rand Corporation ($1.0M), Endowment of the US Institute of Peace ($900k).
Does The Li Lu Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Li Lu Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Li Lu Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California, Wm Keck Foundation.
Where is The Li Lu Foundation based?
The Li Lu Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Li Lu’s filings →

More from the funding graph