Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Levine Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$268k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$626kHuman Services$92kHealth$90kEducation$54kFood & Nutrition$37kAnimals$31kInternational$31kReligion$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$110,000
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR AUTISM$75,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$25,000
BROTHER WOLF ANIMAL RESCUE$20,000
MANNA FOOD BANK$20,000
EQUAL PLATES PROJECT$5,000
PENLAND SCHOOL OF CRAFT$3,000
PHILABUNDANCE$1,001
PHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS$1,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,000
JEW BELONG$1,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$1,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$1,000
ASHEVILLE STRONG$1,000
PSPCA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOTHERS HOME: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$237k · 16 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$237k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+47%

Still filing today

63%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEVS HUMAN SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2022 · $90k · revenue +68%
  • Northwestern University
    5× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +41%
  • MY
    MINDING YOUR MIND
    5× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • MH
    MOTHERS' HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
6
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
10
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Nystagmus Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Animal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Homeless Services & ShelterWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Veteran Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%14%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr17%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr17%1%20–35yr15%4%35–55yr17%85%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,136

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $625,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA+2 more — $6,000 · PhilanthropyJEVS HUMAN SERVICES — $90,000 · OtherJEVS HUMAN SERVICESTHE WHARTON FUND — $50,001 · OtherTHE WHARTON FUNDMANNA FOOD BANK — $25,500 · OtherMANNA FOOD BANKHAR ZION TEMPLE — $12,800 · OtherHAR ZION TEMPLE+12 more — $25,001 · Other+12 moreINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR AUSTISM INC — $75,000 · HealthINTERNATIO…MINDING YOUR MIND — $8,500 · HealthMINDING YO…ONE MIND AT WORK INC — $4,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc — $20,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $5,500 · AnimalsPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $4,500 · Animals+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $25,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $5,000 · InternationalPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC — $3,500 · Arts & CulturePenland School Of Craft — $3,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $3,000 · Arts & CultureNorthwestern University — $8,680 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$631,000Other$203,302Health$88,500Animals$31,000International$30,000Arts & Culture$9,500Recreation & Sports$8,680

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $625,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetJEVS HUMAN SERVICES — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR AUSTISM INC — $75,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $8,680 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMINDING YOUR MIND — $8,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPhilabundance — $6,501 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEGIVEASHARE Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetONE MIND AT WORK INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPenland School Of Craft — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAsheville Strong — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS' HOME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWBELONG INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Levine Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph