Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Leo J and Roslyn L Krupp Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$153kInternational$112kSocial Science$93kCivil Rights$72kReligion$56kEducation$41kHealth$40kHuman Services$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k52 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
$1,200
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLIN-SANG-RUBY UNION INSTITUTE$28,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$18,000
WTTW$16,500
BETH TIKVAH CONGREGATION$5,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$3,000
MUSEUM OF TOLERANCE$3,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$3,000
ARZA$2,500
THE ARK$2,500
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER$2,500
RELIGIOUS ACTION CENTER OF REFORM JUDAISM$2,500
SHALVA$2,500
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$2,500
WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM$2,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FILL A HEART 4 KIDS: $100 → 8%LANGE FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $3k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $2k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $2k → 14%SHALVA: $3k → 14%SHALVA: $3k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $2k → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 14%CJE SENIORLIFE: $1k → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 14%JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $400 → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 14%JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $300 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Leo J and Roslyn L Krupp Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 61%.

The Leo J and Roslyn L Krupp Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$661k · 66 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

66 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
36

Total granted

$661k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+25%

Still filing today

58%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $89k · revenue +198%
  • WT
    WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +16%
  • NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • OU
    OLIN-SANG-RUBY UNION INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • GW
    GLENBARD WEST CENTENNIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • GF
    GREENE FAMILY CAMP
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
5
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
6
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
7
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
8
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
9
Chicago Chesed Fund

To raise and distribute funds, goods, food, and assistance to the poverty-stricken in the jewish community.

Human Services
10
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
11
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
12
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is First Folio Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/70
Grantees still filing
51/70
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $98,400 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMBETH TIKVAH CONGREGATION: $37,700 · OtherBETH TIKVAH CONGREGATIONOLIN-SANG-RUBY UNION INSTITUTE: $24,500 · OtherOLIN-SANG-RUBY UNION INSTITUTEPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $16,900 · OtherTHE ARK: $14,200 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $14,550 · Other+67 more: $186,150 · Other+67 moreWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $84,500 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORL…HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $14,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL C…GUITARS IN THE CLASSROOM: $7,000 · Arts & CultureGUITARS IN THE CLA…+5 more: $4,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $89,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS …JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $14,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL F…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $7,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTER…+3 more: $1,750 · InternationalNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $16,250 · Community ImprovementJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $11,000 · Community ImprovementWILMETTE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Community ImprovementGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $13,950 · Food & NutritionMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $11,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionSHALVA INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $9,400 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human Services+3 more: $1,150 · Human ServicesUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $13,320 · EducationGLENBARD WEST BOOSTERS CLUB INC: $6,000 · EducationONE AIM ILLINOIS: $1,500 · Education+5 more: $2,000 · Education
Other$392,400Arts & Culture$118,500International$111,750Community Improvement$28,750Food & Nutrition$25,950Human Services$24,050Education$22,820

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $89,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $84,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $16,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $14,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $13,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $13,320 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $12,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $11,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $9,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,250 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetGUITARS IN THE CLASSROOM: $7,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLENBARD WEST BOOSTERS CLUB INC: $6,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetGlen Ellyn Historical Society: $4,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDEBORAH'S PLACE: $4,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTRYV365 INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILMETTE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetWILMETTE HARBOR ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetONE AIM ILLINOIS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKESHET: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST FOLIO THEATRE: $1,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSearch Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH LIBRARIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONVIVIUM URBAN FARMSTEAD: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEN ELLYN FOOD PANTRY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZIONESS MOVEMENT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Council on Urban Affairs ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GUITARS IN THE CLASSROOM ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GLENBARD WEST BOOSTERS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Glen Ellyn Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Circle of Service FoundationIL17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Circle of Service Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Leo J and Roslyn L Krupp Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Leo J and Roslyn L Krupp Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Leo J and Roslyn L Krupp Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Leo J and Roslyn L Krupp Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leo J and Roslyn L Krupp Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph