Skip to content
The Lee and Jeffrey Feil Family Foundation Inc C/O Jeffrey J Feil at a glance

· Private foundation

The Lee and Jeffrey Feil Family Foundation Inc C/O Jeffrey J Feil

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$266k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$143kHealth$113kHuman Services$36kInternational$25kPhilanthropy$16kArts & Culture$13kEducation$9kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$350k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MESITVA YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN$50,000
MOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAU$50,000
THE HAMPTON SYNAGOGUE$30,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS$25,000
MOUNT SINAI CHILDRENS CENTER FOUNDATION$20,000
LIMB KIND FOUNDATION$20,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNITED HOSPITAL FUND$10,000
NOMA SALON SUPPER CLUB$8,000
SCS FOUNDATION$5,000
TOURO SYNAGOGUE$5,000
CHABAB JEWISH CENTER$5,000
NOLAN ROBERT HIGGINS TRUST$5,000
JEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CHABAB JEWISH CENTER: $10k → 15%CHABAB JEWISH CENTER: $5k → 15%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
3
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
4
Evan Joseph Gerstein Foundation
Health
5
Manhattan Eye & Ear Ophthalmology Alumni Foundation Inc
Health
6
New York Physicians Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Jewish Life Foundation
—
9
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
10
The Chasdei Shimon Foundation
Religion
11
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
12
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mount Sinai Children's Center Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Gambino Medical and Science Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC: $67,500 · OtherWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INCMOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAU: $50,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAUMESITVA YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN: $50,000 · OtherMESITVA YESHIVA CHAIM BERLINI HAVE A DREAM: $25,000 · OtherI HAVE A DREAMTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $48,000 · Other+12 moreLimb Kind Foundation: $20,000 · HealthLimb Kind…UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $10,000 · HealthUNITED HO…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthChabad Jewish Center: $15,000 · Human ServicesENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesRVC COMMUNITY FUND INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesJunior Achievement of Greater New Orleans Inc: $25,000 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $11,000 · PhilanthropyPENCIL INC: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$270,500Health$31,000Human Services$26,000International$25,000Philanthropy$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJunior Achievement of Greater New Orleans Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetChabad Jewish Center: $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRVC COMMUNITY FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Feil Family Found…Jewish Communal FundJpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Feil Family Foundation (Formerly Louis & Gertrude Feil Foundation Inc)NY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Feil Family Foundation (Formerly Louis & Gertrude Feil Foundation Inc) · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lee and Jeffrey Feil Family Foundation Inc C/O Jeffrey J Feil funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lee and Jeffrey Feil Family Foundation Inc C/O Jeffrey J Feil. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lee and Jeffrey Feil Family Foundation Inc C/O Jeffrey J Feil’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home