Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lee and Jeffrey Feil Family Foundation Inc C/O Jeffrey J Feil

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$266k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Religion$143kHealth$113kHuman Services$36kInternational$25kPhilanthropy$16kArts & Culture$13kEducation$9kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$350k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MESITVA YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN$50,000
MOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAU$50,000
THE HAMPTON SYNAGOGUE$30,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS$25,000
LIMB KIND FOUNDATION$20,000
MOUNT SINAI CHILDRENS CENTER FOUNDATION$20,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNITED HOSPITAL FUND$10,000
NOMA SALON SUPPER CLUB$8,000
CHABAB JEWISH CENTER$5,000
JEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA$5,000
SCS FOUNDATION$5,000
TOURO SYNAGOGUE$5,000
NOLAN ROBERT HIGGINS TRUST$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CHABAB JEWISH CENTER: $10k → 15%CHABAB JEWISH CENTER: $5k → 15%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
2
The Keren Rachaim Fund
3
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
4
Evan Joseph Gerstein Foundation
Health
5
Manhattan Eye & Ear Ophthalmology Alumni Foundation Inc
Health
6
New York Physicians Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Jewish Life Foundation
9
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
10
The Chasdei Shimon Foundation
Religion
11
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
12
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mount Sinai Children's Center Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Gambino Medical and Science Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC — $67,500 · OtherWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INCMOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAU — $50,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI SOUTH NASSAUMESITVA YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN — $50,000 · OtherMESITVA YESHIVA CHAIM BERLINI HAVE A DREAM — $25,000 · OtherI HAVE A DREAMTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · OtherTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+12 more — $48,000 · Other+12 moreLimb Kind Foundation — $20,000 · HealthLimb Kind…UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK — $10,000 · HealthUNITED HO…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthChabad Jewish Center — $15,000 · Human ServicesENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesRVC COMMUNITY FUND INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesJunior Achievement of Greater New Orleans Inc — $25,000 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $11,000 · PhilanthropyPENCIL INC — $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$270,500Health$31,000Human Services$26,000International$25,000Philanthropy$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJunior Achievement of Greater New Orleans Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetChabad Jewish Center — $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Feil Family Foundation (Formerly Louis & Gertrude Feil Foundation Inc)NY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Feil Family Foundation (Formerly Louis & Gertrude Feil Foundation Inc) · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lee and Jeffrey Feil Family Foundation Inc C/O Jeffrey J Feil funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph