Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lbj Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$351kHealth$160kPublic Benefit$48kFood & Nutrition$40kArts & Culture$32kCrime & Legal$27kPhilanthropy$21kHuman Services$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$3,609
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$40,000
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$20,000
ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY$20,000
DELL CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW$10,000
COMMUNITY FOOD CENTRES CANADA$10,000
AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY GROUP OF ONTARIO$3,609
CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION ISLAND SCHOOL$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE LBJ NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK$1,000
MD ANDERSON$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 16%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
SD
PA
CA
VA
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Lbj Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Lbj Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$619k · 36 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
25

Total granted

$619k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+10%

Still filing today

58%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $146k · revenue +90%
  • ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $58k · revenue +5%
  • DC
    DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • TI
    TEXSAR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • PF
    PLAYING FOR CHANGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +123%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
2
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
3
Austin College

The mission of austin college is to educate students in the liberal arts and sciences in order to prepare them for rewarding careers and for full, engaged and meaningful lives.

Education
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

9
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
10
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dell Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Aids Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsCommunity FoundationsGovernment Accountability R…Independent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFallen First Responder Supp…Community Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Native Hawaiian Community D…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Land Conservation Organizat…Food Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%54%35–55yr16%31%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,526

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
23/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY GROUP OF ONTARIO — $58,300 · OtherPEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY GROUP OF ONTARIODELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONLBJ FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherLBJ FOUNDATIONCollege Axis Project Inc — $25,000 · OtherCollege Axis Project IncGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW — $22,200 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAWTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $19,725 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $13,000 · Other+41 more — $141,827 · Other+41 moreMIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $146,050 · EducationMIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $58,325 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITYSt Edwards University — $30,952 · EducationSt Edwards UniversityUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA+3 more — $11,820 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $16,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH — $7,750 · HealthFriends of Lyndon B Johnson National Historical Park — $10,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE — $8,150 · Arts & CultureGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $12,500 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $14,325 · Food & NutritionWILDFLOWER DONOR INC — $5,475 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $5,000 · Environment
Other$370,052Education$277,147Health$34,250Arts & Culture$18,150Philanthropy$17,500Food & Nutrition$14,325Environment$10,475

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $146,050 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $58,325 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSt Edwards University — $30,952 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Axis Project Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $19,725 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $14,325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Lyndon B Johnson National Historical Park — $10,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTEXSAR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE — $8,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH — $7,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $7,525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $5,225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYING FOR CHANGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS AND BETTER EDUCATION — $4,820 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNative American Heritage Association — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN POLICE OPERATION BLUE SANTA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPease Park Conservancy — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds St Edwards University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds College Axis Project Inc
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Friends of Lyndon B Johnson National Historical Park
  • Who funds TEXSAR INC
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds WILDFLOWER DONOR INC
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds PLAYING FOR CHANGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
  • Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS AND BETTER EDUCATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Moody Foundation · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lbj Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lbj Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lbj Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph