Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$306kHealth$112kArts & Culture$28kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kFood & Nutrition$16kHousing & Shelter$6kHuman Services$4kPhilanthropy$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION$30,000
NEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION$5,000
NEW MILFORD HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
ROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC$2,000
NEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CT$1,000
HUNT HILL FARM TRUST$1,000
RENEWAL HOUSE SHELTER OF THE CROSS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$526k · 20 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$526k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+37%

Still filing today

45%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $261k · revenue +79%
  • NM
    NEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +153%
  • RH
    RENEWAL HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Danbury Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +37%
  • DH
    Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -12%
  • TN
    THEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Health Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
2
Norwalk Hospital Foundation

The mission of norwalk hospital foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to norwalk hospital and other not-for-profit norwalk hospital affiliates.

Health
3
The Norwalk Hospital Association

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
4
West Colebrook Farm Company
Arts & Culture
5
New Haven Volunteer Fire Corp

Volunteer fire department that responds to active structure fires, auto accidents and medical emergencies.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Winchester Historical Society
—
7
The Milford Hospital Inc

To effectively and efficiently provide high quality healthcare services.

—
8
Canaan Fire Company Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Kent County Memorial Hospital

Kent county memorial hospital is devoted to continually improving the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve, offering our essential services without regard for ability to pay. please refer to schedule o for the…

Health
10
Wickham Park Tr
—
11
Greater Hartford Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
12
The Noroton Heights Fire Department Incorporated

The Noroton Heights Fire Department, Incorporated provides fire and other emergency response services to its district within the Town of Darien, Connecticut, as well as providing mutual aid coverage to the other fire departments in town…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Milford Community Ambulance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hunt Hill Farm Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $260,905 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INCNEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherNEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $44,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF FINE ARTS: $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF FINE ARTSNEW MILFORD HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherNEW MILFORD HIGH SCHOOLNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC: $9,000 · OtherROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · Other+9 more: $26,750 · Other+9 moreThe Danbury Hospital: $18,000 · HealthDanbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc: $10,000 · HealthCAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED: $5,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8,500 · Public Safety & DisasterHUNT HILL FARM TRUST: $5,750 · EnvironmentPRATT NATURE CENTER INC: $500 · EnvironmentRENEWAL HOUSE INC: $6,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$260,905Other$236,750Health$28,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$8,500Environment$6,250Housing & Shelter$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $260,905 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Danbury Hospital: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $8,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetRENEWAL HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetHUNT HILL FARM TRUST: $5,750 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKENT COMMUNITY FUND INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetACCESS TENNIS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetCOMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CT LLC: $2,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPRATT NATURE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Danbury Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds ROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RENEWAL HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNT HILL FARM TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds KENT COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS TENNIS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CT LLC ↗
  • Who funds THEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD ↗
  • Who funds PRATT NATURE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Persbacker Foundation IncCT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Persbacker Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · Jean Widmark and Richard Widmark Foundation Inc · Savings Bank of Danbury Foundation Inc · The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation · Kermit and Patricia Adler Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • After School Arts Program Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Danbury Hospital: 1% of income from government
  • Pratt Nature Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell’s filings →

More from the funding graph