Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of THE LAWRENCE J PORTELL AND NATALIE D PORTELL FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION$30,000
NEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
NEW MILFORD HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
ROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC$2,000
NEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE$1,500
HUNT HILL FARM TRUST$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CT$1,000
RENEWAL HOUSE SHELTER OF THE CROSS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$526k · 20 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$526k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+31%

Still filing today

45%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $261k · revenue +79%
  • NM
    NEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +153%
  • RH
    RENEWAL HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Danbury Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +31%
  • DH
    Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -18%
  • TN
    THEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Health Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
2
Norwalk Hospital Foundation

The mission of norwalk hospital foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to norwalk hospital and other not-for-profit norwalk hospital affiliates.

Health
3
The Norwalk Hospital Association

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
4
West Colebrook Farm Company
Arts & Culture
5
New Haven Volunteer Fire Corp

Volunteer fire department that responds to active structure fires, auto accidents and medical emergencies.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Winchester Historical Society
7
The Milford Hospital Inc

To effectively and efficiently provide high quality healthcare services.

8
Canaan Fire Company Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Kent County Memorial Hospital

Kent county memorial hospital is devoted to continually improving the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve, offering our essential services without regard for ability to pay. please refer to schedule o for the…

Health
10
Wickham Park Tr
11
Greater Hartford Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
12
The Noroton Heights Fire Department Incorporated

The Noroton Heights Fire Department, Incorporated provides fire and other emergency response services to its district within the Town of Darien, Connecticut, as well as providing mutual aid coverage to the other fire departments in town…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Milford Community Ambulance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hunt Hill Farm Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $260,905 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INCNEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherNEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $44,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF FINE ARTS — $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF FINE ARTSNEW MILFORD HIGH SCHOOL — $25,000 · OtherNEW MILFORD HIGH SCHOOLNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC — $9,000 · OtherROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · Other+9 more — $26,750 · Other+9 moreThe Danbury Hospital — $18,000 · HealthDanbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc — $10,000 · HealthCAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED — $5,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $8,500 · Public Safety & DisasterHUNT HILL FARM TRUST — $5,750 · EnvironmentPRATT NATURE CENTER INC — $500 · EnvironmentRENEWAL HOUSE INC — $6,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$260,905Other$236,750Health$28,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$8,500Environment$6,250Housing & Shelter$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $260,905 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Danbury Hospital — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC — $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $8,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetRENEWAL HOUSE INC — $6,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetHUNT HILL FARM TRUST — $5,750 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED — $5,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKENT COMMUNITY FUND INC — $4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetACCESS TENNIS INC — $3,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetCOMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CT LLC — $2,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPRATT NATURE CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Danbury Hospital
  • Who funds Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds NEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC
  • Who funds ROXBURY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ROXBURY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
  • Who funds RENEWAL HOUSE INC
  • Who funds HUNT HILL FARM TRUST
  • Who funds CAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC
  • Who funds KENT COMMUNITY FUND INC
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds ACCESS TENNIS INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CT LLC
  • Who funds THEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD
  • Who funds PRATT NATURE CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Persbacker Foundation IncCT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Persbacker Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · Jean Widmark and Richard Widmark Foundation Inc · Savings Bank of Danbury Foundation Inc · The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation · Kermit and Patricia Adler Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • After School Arts Program Inc1% of income from government
  • The Danbury Hospital1% of income from government
  • Pratt Nature Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Lawrence J Portell and Natalie D Portell Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph