Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lawlor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$91kReligion$74kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kHuman Services$62kEducation$60kArts & Culture$56kHealth$55kHousing & Shelter$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$755k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
CATHOLIC THEOLOGICAL UNION$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGO$10,000
OXFAM AMERICA$8,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$8,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DESPOSITORY$8,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$4,000
FOUNDATION FOR HOMAN SQUARE$4,000
THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE$4,000
CNEWA$3,000
URBAN INITIATIVES$3,000
DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY$3,000
SAINTS FAITH HOPE AND CHARITY$2,500
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$2,000
MISERICORDIA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
CA
MO
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$701k · 46 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
2

Total granted

$701k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+210%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +39%
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +16%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +210%
  • GU
    GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Lane. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGO: $60,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGOAMERICAN RED CROSS: $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCATHOLIC THEOLOGICAL UNION: $56,000 · OtherCATHOLIC THEOLOGICAL UNIONCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $24,000 · OtherCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INC: $18,000 · OtherBONAVENTURE HOUSE: $17,500 · Other+29 more: $219,084 · Other+29 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $48,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $44,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA …DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $18,000 · EducationHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $6,000 · EducationTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $6,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $6,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $6,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $2,500 · EducationGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $38,000 · Food & NutritionURBAN INITIATIVES INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $24,000 · EnvironmentFOUNDATION FOR HOMAN SQUARE F/K/A HOMAN ARTHINGTON FOUNDATION: $24,000 · Community Improvement
Other$454,584International$92,000Education$49,500Food & Nutrition$38,000Human Services$30,000Environment$24,000Community Improvement$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $48,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $44,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $24,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HOMAN SQUARE F/K/A HOMAN ARTHINGTON FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN INITIATIVES INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENA FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GREAT BOOKS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Association for Research and Education in Science: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLake Forest College: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Lane: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetClearwater Camp Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HOMAN SQUARE F/K/A HOMAN ARTHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds URBAN INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GREAT BOOKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lawlor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lawlor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawlor’s filings →

More from the funding graph