Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lanward Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of The Lanward Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to El Paso Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Lanward Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $27k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
7
’18
6
’19
3
’20
7
’21
5
’22
6
’23
6
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$61kHealth$61kReligion$30kEducation$22kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kPublic Benefit$8kOther$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$688k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION -- LANWARD FOUNDATION FUND$5,000
EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - GENERAL FUND$5,000
EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION -- ANEICA AZAR FUND$5,000
DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES$3,500
INFORMING AMERICA FOUNDATION$3,500
DAVID LEE TEX HILL COMPOSITE SQUADRON TX-43 CIVIL AIR PATROL$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO$500
PHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST$495
ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY$300
UNIVERSITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$100
Individual grant recipient$70
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $3k → 21%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $3k → 21%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $1k → 21%RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO: $1k → 21%RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO: $500 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$190k · 24 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +74% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
16

Total granted

$190k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+74%

Still filing today

46%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $37k · revenue +27%
  • RG
    RIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +80%
  • EP
    EL PASO BAPTIST CLINIC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • PD
    PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +82%
  • PD
    PASO DEL NORTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF SAINT CLEMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
El Paso Matters Inc

Engage in the highest quality independent production, publication and or distribution of orginial news and or news-based materials of community value to far west texas, southern new mexico and northern chihuahua, mexico.

Public Benefit
2
Hospice of El Paso Inc

The mission of hospice of el paso, inc. is to provide interdisciplinary care designed to meet the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of patients and their families who are coping with terminal illness and resulting losses.

Human Services
3
El Paso County Medical Society

Professional association of physicians.

—
4
El Paso Museum of Art Foundation

To create a permanent endowment fund to support the el paso museum of art. a portion of the capital appreciation and earnings are distributed annually to the el paso museum of art and used for acquisitions, conservation and preservation,…

Arts & Culture
5
El Paso Community College Foundation

The foundation was formed to receive gifts and to invest, manage and distribute such gifts for the benefit of the el paso community college and its students. the foundation promotes education and other related activities of the college.

Education
6
El Paso Chamber of Commerce

The mission of el paso chamber of commerce is to support business and our community by providing opportunities for connecting, coaching, advocating, and innovating.

—
7
El Paso High School Alumni Museum

To maintain, design and operate a museum to celebrate the history of el paso high school, el paos, tx.

Arts & Culture
8
El Paso Education Initiative Inc

The purpose of the organization is to develop and facilitate the implementation of goals and programs that will enhance educational opportunities.

Education
9
El Paso Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the hispanic chamber of commerce is to continue to be the pre-eminent resource for business and leading advocate in supporting the growth of the el paso border metroplex.

—
10
El Paso Veterinary Medical Association

The el paso veterinary medical association is dedicated to the advancement of animal health. epvma promotes advancement of the veterinary profession and well being of its members. epvma's mission is to increase public awareness about…

—
11
El Paso Human Services Inc

El paso human services, inc. (ephsi), a private non-profit multi-purpose organization, has been providing social services in el paso county since 1984. ephsi has extensive experience in developing, implementing and executing federal, state…

Human Services
12
El Paso Public Television Foundation Inc

To inspire, inform and educate our viewer through quality educational programming; while producing superb local programs tailored to our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Center for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dutch Sheets Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST VICENT DE PAUL: $20,000 · OtherST VICENT DE PAULEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION -- ANEICA AZAR FUND: $14,000 · OtherEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION -- ANEICA AZAR FUNDEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION -- LANWARD FOUNDATION FUND: $14,000 · OtherEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION -- LANWARD FOUNDATION FUNDEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - GENERAL FUND: $13,000 · OtherEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - GENERAL FUNDROTOCARE EL PASO: $8,500 · OtherROTOCARE EL PASODAVID LEE TEX HILL COMPOSITE SQUADRON TX-43 CIVIL AIR PATROL: $8,500 · OtherDAVID LEE TEX HILL COMPOSITE SQUADRON TX-43 CIVIL AIR PATROLRIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherRIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATIONEL PASO BAPTIST CLINIC: $8,000 · OtherEL PASO BAPTIST CLINICUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO ASSET MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT: $5,550 · OtherTOM LEA INSTITUTE: $5,500 · Other+28 more: $25,406 · Other+28 moreTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $36,500 · HealthTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RE…PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2,500 · HealthPASO DEL NORTE CHIL…EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 · PhilanthropyEL PASO C…PHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST: $2,790 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHR…ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $7,000 · Human ServicesRESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC: $7,500 · ReligionINFORMING AMERICA FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Public Benefit
Other$130,456Health$39,000Philanthropy$18,790Education$11,000Human Services$8,500Religion$7,500Public Benefit$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $36,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEL PASO BAPTIST CLINIC: $8,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINFORMING AMERICA FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $7,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTOM LEA INSTITUTE: $5,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST: $2,790 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINGS KIDS EL PASO INC C/0 R H POFAHL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEL PASO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,100 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMANS CLUB OF EL PASO TEXAS: $368 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSt Mary's University: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAR EAGLES AIR MUSEUM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF EL PASO INC: $88 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO BAPTIST CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INFORMING AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO ↗
  • Who funds TOM LEA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KINGS KIDS EL PASO INC C/0 R H POFAHL ↗
  • Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMANS CLUB OF EL PASO TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds St Mary's University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Paso Community FoundationTX28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Paso Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Health Foundation · The Shiloff Family Foundation · Feinberg Foundation · The Stewart Family Charitable Foundation Marlene Stewart Trustee · Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003 · Alternative House Inc · Larry & Norma Price Family Charitable Foundation · Hervey Foundation · The Hunt Family Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lanward Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lanward Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lanward Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lanward Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lanward’s filings →

    More from the funding graph