· Private foundation
The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k67 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $142k
- $250k+1 grant · $420k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY | $420,000 |
| ST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDA | $30,000 |
| LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC | $26,300 |
| STUDENT SPONSOR PARTNERS | $15,000 |
| SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE - FLORIDA | $11,000 |
| ST DAVID'S SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $10,000 |
| NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR-HOME FOR THE AGED | $10,000 |
| NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE - USA | $10,000 |
| THE ELM PROJECT | $7,000 |
| COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC | $5,000 |
| THRIVE FOR LIFE PRISON PROJECT INC | $5,000 |
| ST JEAN BAPTISTE HIGH SCHOOL | $4,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
83 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY4× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +36%- LHLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $83k · revenue +9%
- SCSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC5× · 2020–2024 · $72k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- GUGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY WSAone grant, 2023 · $426k
- GDGOD DEMANDS LOVE INCone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue 0%
- SFST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSP FDN UGANDAone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Caldwell County Animal Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC ↗
- Who funds STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAM HOUSE ↗
- Who funds GOD DEMANDS LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Primary Stages Company Inc ↗
- Who funds American Disabilities Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOSSOM HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
- Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Renee & Carl Landegger Family Charit · Synchrony Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · American Express Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Morris Family Foundation · The Tudor Foundation Inc · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Domus Kids Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Triangle Community Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- Soundwaters Inc — 4% of income from government
- Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- ME2 Orchestra Inc — 1% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
- Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- Silvermine Guild of Artists Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Ballet Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.