Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$622k
Granted FY2025still arriving
84
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$417k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.3MHuman Services$305kHealth$107kYouth Development$91kArts & Culture$82kCrime & Legal$80kReligion$74kInternational$52kOther$0
02FY2025 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k75 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
  • $250k+1 grant · $417k
$600
Median grant
17
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$416,500
LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC$17,500
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE - FLORIDA$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$15,000
ST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSP FDN UGANDA$15,000
STUDENT SPONSOR PARTNERS$15,000
NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC$12,800
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE - USA$10,000
ST DAVID'S SCHOOL$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARIS$6,000
THRIVE FOR LIFE PRISON PROJECT INC$5,000
COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$5,000
THE ELM PROJECT$5,000
SAMARITAN DAY TOP VILLAGE INC$5,000
JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BACKING THE BLUE LINE INC: $500 → 11%COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $5k → 10%BE A FRIEND PROJECT: $250 → 6%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FL: $100 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%RAINBOW OMEGA INC: $2k → 18%HEALING HANDS OF JOY: $500 → 10%JUSTIN COWBOY CRISIS FUND: $250 → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT: $1k → 11%BACKING THE BLUE LINE INC: $500 → 11%COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5k → 10%HUNGRY SOULS INC: $500 → 10%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FL: $100 → 13%THE SAFE ALLIANCE: $500 → 10%THE SAFE ALLIANCE: $500 → 10%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $1k → 6%THE SAFE ALLIANCE: $250 → 10%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $1k → 6%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $250 → 10%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $500 → 10%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $500 → 10%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $500 → 10%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $500 → 10%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $500 → 10%SPARC INC: $2k → 9%SPARC INC: $2k → 9%THE ARC TAMPA BAY FOUNDATION: $400 → 12%THE ARC TAMPA BAY FOUNDATION: $200 → 12%THE ARC TAMPA BAY FOUNDATION: $200 → 12%THE ARC TAMPA BAY FOUNDATION: $100 → 12%THE ARC TAMPA BAY FOUNDATION: $100 → 12%THE ARC TAMPA BAY FOUNDATION: $100 → 12%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $26k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $18k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $18k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $16k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $13k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 101 repeat orgs$623k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

101 repeat relationships: 62 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

101
85

Total granted

$3.2M
$605k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+6%

Still filing today

62%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +36%
  • LH
    LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • SP
    STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • GU
    GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY WSA
    one grant, 2023 · $426k
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -47% · 80% of their budget
  • GD
    GOD DEMANDS LOVE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fund for the City of New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Parity Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 210 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
127/130
Grantees still filing
79/130
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $2,117,857 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $75,000 · Education+16 more: $41,490 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY WSA: $426,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY WSASOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $86,500 · OtherSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINCCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $58,000 · OtherSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $50,000 · OtherST DAVID'S SCHOOL: $50,000 · Other+127 more: $499,446 · Other+127 moreLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $100,300 · Human ServicesNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Disabilities Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $10,000 · Human Services+15 more: $18,300 · Human ServicesNEW YORK CITY CENTER INC: $52,800 · Arts & CulturePrimary Stages Company Inc: $13,000 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $5,500 · Arts & CultureBOSTON BALLET INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureUnited Ballet Theatre Inc: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+17 more: $13,050 · Arts & CultureST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDA INC: $30,000 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED: $10,000 · HealthWESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthSAMARITAN DAYTOP VILLAGE INC: $6,000 · HealthCHEMO COMFORT INC: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50,500 · Civil RightsTHE ELM PROJECT: $35,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth Development
Education$2,234,347Other$1,169,946Human Services$195,600Arts & Culture$93,350Health$55,000Civil Rights$50,500Youth Development$36,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $2,117,857 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $100,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $86,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $75,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK CITY CENTER INC: $52,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ELM PROJECT: $35,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 80% of budgetABRAHAM HOUSE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWILKES UNIVERSITY: $15,390 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Disabilities Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetPrimary Stages Company Inc: $13,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBLOSSOM HILL FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHRIVE FOR LIFE PRISON PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN DAYTOP VILLAGE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORWALKSTAMFORD GRASSROOTS TENNIS & EDUCATION INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES WHEELCHAIR SPORTS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBOSTON BALLET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe IIIB's Foundation: $4,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSPARC INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Ballet Theatre Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $3,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $2,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBACK THE BLUE NC INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SABOT SCHOOL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW OMEGA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJunior League of Clearwater-Dunedin Inc: $2,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHEMO COMFORT INC: $2,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD DEMANDS LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Disabilities Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Primary Stages Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOSSOM HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR - HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE FOR LIFE PRISON PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Renee & Carl Landegger Family CharitNY30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Renee & Carl Landegger Family Charit · Synchrony Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · American Express Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Morris Family Foundation · The Tudor Foundation Inc · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Domus Kids Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Triangle Community Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Soundwaters Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • ME2 Orchestra Inc: 1% of income from government
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Silvermine Guild of Artists Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Ballet Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 210 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Landegger’s filings →

More from the funding graph