How much does The Kroll Family Foundation give?

The Kroll Family Foundation reported 38 grants totaling $27,300 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 26 and 52 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does The Kroll Family Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (41%), Animals (17%), International (6%).

Who are The Kroll Family Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Blood Cancer United Inc ($100k), Anderson Center for Autism ($25k), Wildlife Conservation Society ($20k).

Does The Kroll Family Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Kroll Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Kroll Family Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Pcsb Community Foundation, St Faith's House Foundation.

Where is The Kroll Family Foundation based?

The Kroll Family Foundation is based in NY.

The Kroll Family Foundation

The Kroll Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Kroll Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$10k

Largest

01What it funds

0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$139kAnimals$58kInternational$20kHuman Services$19kEducation$14kFood & Nutrition$10kCivil Rights$8kCrime & Legal$8kOther$0

02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k37 grants · $17k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$500

Median grant

States reached

$565k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY	$10,000
WCC	$1,000
FEEDING WESTCHESTER	$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY	$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD	$1,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS	$1,000
GREEN CHIMNEYS CHILDRENS SERVICES	$900
GREEN CHIMNEYS CHILDRENS SERVICES	$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS	$500
UNHCR	$500
SAVE THE CHILDREN	$500
NAACP	$500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER	$500
GREENBURG NATURE CENTER	$500
TUNNELS TO TOWERS	$500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$287k · 53 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$287k

$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%

+15%

Still filing today

60%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsInternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BC
BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +4%
WC
Wildlife Conservation Society
6× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +59%
NW
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
7× · 2017–2023 · $20k · revenue +72%

Funded once

AC
ANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM
one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +15%
SJ
ST JOHNS UNIV-CHILD HELP PTP
one grant, 2019 · $3k
AM
ANIMAL MANOR INC
one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -13%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals

Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment

The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals

Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment

Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education

Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition

Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment

Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Rshm Life Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

67/69

Grantees still filing

53/69

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Health$106,990Other$106,833Animals$50,590Education$38,272International$19,797Human Services$15,875Environment$3,760

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Pcsb Community Foundation · St Faith's House Foundation · Raffiani Family Foundation Inc · Peckham Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kroll Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kroll Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Kroll Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home