Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kogan Charitable Foundation Inc % Peapack Private Family Office Services

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$149k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$488kEducation$244kArts & Culture$75kReligion$38kCommunity Improvement$25kRecreation & Sports$12kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEYOND CELIAC$25,000
ST BARNABAS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$25,000
CELIAC DISEASE CENTER AT COLUMBIA U$20,000
JOSEPHS HOUSE INC$15,000
SITAR ARTS CENTER$15,000
North Carolina Foundation for Nursi$10,000
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$10,000
TRUSTEES OF NEWARK ACADEMY$10,000
THE SEEING EYE INC$7,500
CONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN$5,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$5,000
MRCC FOUNDATION INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE SEEING EYE INC: $8k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $8k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $8k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $5k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $5k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $5k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $5k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$699k · 13 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$699k
$5k

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NEWARK ACADEMY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $170k · revenue +39%
  • BC
    BEYOND CELIAC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $145k · revenue +172%
  • JH
    JOSEPH'S HOUSE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $75k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENS
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
4
New York Institute of Technology

New york institute of technology (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on…

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Summit Speech School; the most unlike its peers is Joseph's House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEWARK ACADEMY: $170,000 · EducationNEWARK ACADEMYTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $130,600 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY…New York University: $35,000 · EducationNew York UniversityWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY+3 more: $13,000 · EducationBEYOND CELIAC: $145,000 · HealthBEYOND CELIACJOSEPH'S HOUSE INC: $75,000 · HealthJOSEPH'S HOUSE INCST BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER: $75,000 · OtherST BARNABAS MEDICAL C…CONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN: $37,500 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI JES…ST BARNABAS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherST BARNABAS DEVELOPME…NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION FOR NURSING INC: $10,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA FOUNDA…CAMP QUALITY USA INC: $10,000 · OtherCAMP QUALITY USA INC+2 more: $10,000 · Other+2 moreSITAR ARTS CENTER: $75,000 · Arts & CultureSITAR ART…THE SEEING EYE INC: $42,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER NEWARK TENNIS & EDUCATION: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$373,600Health$220,000Other$167,500Arts & Culture$75,000Human Services$42,500Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEWARK ACADEMY: $170,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND CELIAC: $145,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $130,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJOSEPH'S HOUSE INC: $75,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSITAR ARTS CENTER: $75,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $42,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION FOR NURSING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER NEWARK TENNIS & EDUCATION: $2,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE PINGRY CORPORATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMRCC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEWARK ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND CELIAC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SITAR ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION FOR NURSING INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds CAMP QUALITY USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GREATER NEWARK TENNIS & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PINGRY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MRCC FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kogan Charitable Foundation Inc % Peapack Private Family Office Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kogan Charitable Foundation Inc % Peapack Private Family Office Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kogan Charitable Foundation Inc % Peapack Private Family Office Services?

    Find your warmest path to The Kogan Charitable Foundation Inc % Peapack Private Family Office Services through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kogan Charitable Foundation Inc % Peapack Private Family Office Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph