Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Knight Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$581k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$884kFood & Nutrition$829kHuman Services$629kPublic Safety & Disaster$385kScience & Tech$365kAnimals$239kYouth Development$220kEducation$188kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $305k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $271k
$22,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TABLE TO TABLE$71,000
CIRCLE OF CARE$50,000
MEND$50,000
BUEHLER CHALLENGER & SCIENCE CENTER$50,000
FRIENDS OF KAREN$50,000
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$45,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$40,000
PONY POWER THERAPIES INC$25,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$25,000
SHARE MY MEALS INC$25,000
DUMPED & STRAY ANIMAL RESCUE INC$22,500
PAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE$20,000
ST LUKE COMMUNITY DEVOPMENT CENTER$17,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB MT VERNON$15,000
SPCA OF WESTCHESTER$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $299k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $25k → 17%SHARE MY MEALS INC: $25k → 11%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $20k → 17%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $8k → 17%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $25k → 7%A CHANCE IN LIFE: $15k → 17%PONY POWER THERAPIES: $18k → 7%A CHANCE IN LIFE INC: $15k → 17%PONY POWER THERAPIES: $15k → 7%PONY POWER THERAPIES: $10k → 7%ROOTS AND WINGS FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%JESPY HOUSE: $33k → 16%JESPY HOUSE: $30k → 16%JESPY HOUSE: $25k → 16%JESPY HOUSE: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 82% of The Knight Family Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 57% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 10%.

The Knight Family Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 28 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
7

Total granted

$3.8M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-8%

Still filing today

54%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TABLE TO TABLE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $436k · revenue +50%
  • EVA'S VILLAGE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $308k · revenue +30%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF KAREN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $307k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • CM
    CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -32%
  • BC
    BUEHLER CHALLENGER CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • MC
    MORRISTOWN COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.

Human Services
2
Family Promise of Southwest Nj

The organization's mission is to provide households experiencing homelessness or are at risk of homelessness, an opportunity to achieve stability by providing comprehensive shelter diversion/homeless prevention, or transitional housing…

Human Services
3
City Relief Inc

City relief provides fresh, nutritious meals and essential care items to individuals in need; as well as creating individualized action plans including connections to programs,offering support and encouragement.

Human Services
4
Jewish Family Service & Children's Center of Clifton-Passaicinc

Jewish family service and children's center of clifton-passaic is a social services and mental health agency that seeks to enhance the lives of indiviuals and families. the organization offers psychotherapy, psychiatry, geriatric, crisis…

Human Services
5
Pascack Valley Meals On Wheels Inc

To deliver hot meals to people within the pascack valley area of bergen county who are unable to shop or cook for themselves because of age or physical disability.

—
6
Community Servings Inc

Community servings' mission is to actively engage the community to provide medically tailored, nutritious, scratch-made meals and medically tailored groceries to chronically and critically ill individuals and their families.

Human Services
7
Caring for the Homeless of Peekskill Inc

At caring for the hungry and homeless of peekskill (chhop), we believe that every person is entitled to safe and affordable housing and healthy nutritious food.

—
8
Center for Hope and Safety Inc

Center for hope and safety, inc.'s ("chs") mission is to assist bergen county, nj victims and survivors of domestic violence, including emotional, economic, sexual and physical abuse. the agency provides emergency and transitional housing,…

Human Services
9
Carelink Community Support Services Nj

Carelink community support services of new jersey's mission is to assist adult citizens of nj living with psychiatric disability in acquiring the tools necessary to live health and fulfilling lives.

Health
10
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
11
Community Housing Innovations Inc

Founded in 1991, community housing innovations, inc. (chi) is a not-for-profit organization serving several new york counties. chi's mission is to provide housing and human services that support social and economic independence. chi's…

—
12
St Vincent Depaul Middletown

St. vincent depaul middletown (svdm) was founded in 1980 by the sisters of mercy and the catholic diocese of norwich. svdm's mission is to provide food, shelter and basic human services to poor and homeless individuals regardless of race,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roots & Wings Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Scholarship Foundation for Hide-a-Way Lake Students. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS: $385,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSBUEHLER CHALLENGER SCIENCE CENTER: $240,000 · OtherBUEHLER CHALLENGER SCIENCE CENTERMADISON SQUARE BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $170,000 · OtherMADISON SQUARE BOYS GIRLS CLUBMEND -MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS W DIG: $147,000 · OtherMEND -MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS W DIGKENNEDY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $140,000 · OtherKENNEDY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $115,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEMEND: $100,000 · OtherMENDBUEHLER CHALLENGER & SCIENCE CENTER: $100,000 · OtherBUEHLER CHALLENGER & SCIENCE CENTER+15 more: $357,500 · Other+15 moreTABLE TO TABLE INC: $436,000 · Food & NutritionTABLE TO TABLE INCCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $270,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELSNOURISHNJ INC: $75,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISHNJ INCFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $307,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF KARE…CIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $160,000 · HealthCIRCLE OF CARE …PROJECT SUNSHINE INC: $50,000 · HealthPROJECT SUNSHIN…CARE PLUS NJ INC: $19,500 · HealthEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $308,000 · Community ImprovementJESPY HOUSE INC: $112,500 · Human ServicesPONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $68,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND BEDTIME INC: $53,000 · Human ServicesA CHANCE IN LIFEINC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSHARE MY MEALS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesPAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $116,000 · AnimalsSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $100,000 · AnimalsDUMPED & STRAY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $22,500 · AnimalsTHE STOREHOUSE PROJECT INC: $45,000 · Religion
Other$1,754,500Food & Nutrition$781,000Health$536,500Community Improvement$308,000Human Services$298,500Animals$238,500Religion$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC: $436,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $308,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $307,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $270,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $160,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetPAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $116,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetJESPY HOUSE INC: $112,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $100,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNOURISHNJ INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $68,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBEYOND BEDTIME INC: $53,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT SUNSHINE INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE STOREHOUSE PROJECT INC: $45,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSPECTRUM FOR LIVING CORPORATION: $32,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA CHANCE IN LIFEINC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCARE PLUS NJ INC: $19,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJosephine's Place Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAFE INC OF SCHENECTADY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEALS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TABLE TO TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds JESPY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHNJ INC ↗
  • Who funds PONY POWER THERAPIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BEDTIME INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SUNSHINE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STOREHOUSE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM FOR LIVING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds A CHANCE IN LIFEINC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE MY MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUMPED & STRAY ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE PLUS NJ INC ↗
  • Who funds Josephine's Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFE INC OF SCHENECTADY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MEALS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank FoundationNJ23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Provident Bank Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Knight Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Knight Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Care Plus Nj Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Nourishnj Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Jespy House Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Knight Family Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Knight Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Knight Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph