· Private foundation
The Kleinschmidt Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k48 grants · $91k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $217k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $482k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART | $205,000 |
| THE FOUNDATION FOR CULTURAL REVIEW (NEW CRITERION) | $102,000 |
| REASON FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| UW OSHKOSH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| MANHATTAN INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| THE FRICK COLLECTION | $43,000 |
| ADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE INC | $40,000 |
| VERO BEACH OPERA | $28,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY | $16,000 |
| FRIENDS OF OFLAG 64 | $12,500 |
| SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE | $12,500 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC INDIAN RIVER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MASS GENERAL | $10,000 |
| CAP-21 | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
88 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC9× · 2017–2025 · $544k · revenue +38%
- TRTHE REASON FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $525k · revenue +80%
- VBVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC8× · 2018–2025 · $520k · revenue ×12
Funded once
- EFENCOUNTER FOR CULTURE AND EDUCATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +224%
- DCDEBUTANTE COLLITION AND CHRISTMAS BALLone grant, 2021 · $30k
- RTROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $29k · revenue +84%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To create a nation where everyone enjoys a fair share of our collective prosperity.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The Knight First Amendment Institute defends the freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through strategic litigation, research, public advocacy and public education. Our aim is to promote a system of free expression that is…
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vero Beach Theatre Guild Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Huguenot Society of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
- Who funds VERO BEACH OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ADIRONDACK PARTNERSHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY INC ↗
- Who funds Williams College ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTER FOR CULTURE AND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SAINT EDWARD'S SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO CHORAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FABRY DISEASE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH ↗
- Who funds BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · Donors Trust Inc · The Rogers Family Foundation · Welsh Family Foundation Inc · The Devito Family Trust (Fka the Beechmont Foundation) · The Kahle Foundation Inc · Sad Foundation Inc · Equitable Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Kleinschmidt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- Vero Beach Theatre Guild Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Learning Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.