Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The King Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$308k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$303k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$3.4MHealth$48kArts & Culture$40kHousing & Shelter$40kEducation$11kFood & Nutrition$6kEnvironment$4kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $5k
  • $250k+1 grant · $303k
$1,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$66k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL$303,000
STOWE JAZZ FESTIVAL$2,500
OLD MILL ROAD PTA$1,100
EXPERIENCE CAMPS$700
MENDED HEARTS$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LONG ISLAND CARES- HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK: $200 → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES- HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK: $200 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
SD
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
KS
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 46 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

46 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
21

Total granted

$3.6M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+37%

Still filing today

59%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MEDICAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +2% · 98% of their budget
  • WB
    WESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +127%
  • EXPERIENCE CAMPS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +507%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $800 · revenue +93%
  • TH
    THE HIGH SCHOOL FOR MATH SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
    one grant, 2018 · $600
  • SC
    SUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL VET OF FOR A
    one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
6
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
7
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
8
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
9
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
10
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
11
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
12
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whyhunger Inc and the most unlike its peers is David and Gisela King Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Reform AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Sports LeaguesEvangelical Churches and Mi…Climate Advocacy Organizati…Nyc Youth Education ProgramsInternational Development &…Historic Preservation & Civ…Family Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%99%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,721

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
30/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEDICAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,443,023 · HealthMEDICAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC+2 more — $2,300 · HealthPECONIC BAY MEDICAL CENTER — $41,200 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $3,500 · OtherEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $2,845 · Other+48 more — $29,138 · OtherDAVID AND GISELA KING FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterWESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $20,000 · Arts & CultureHAMPTON THEATRE COMPANY INC — $2,250 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural History — $2,125 · Arts & CultureQUOGUE CHAMBER MUSIC INC — $1,300 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $1,355 · Arts & CultureSTOWE JAZZ FESTIVAL LTD — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsSTEPHEN GAYNOR SCHOOL — $1,700 · EducationSUFFOLK UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $900 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $800 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $660 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $400 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $100 · Environment
Health$3,445,323Other$76,683Housing & Shelter$40,000Arts & Culture$27,030Recreation & Sports$5,000Education$3,200Environment$2,860

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDICAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,443,023 over 9y, 98% of budgetDAVID AND GISELA KING FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 56% of budgetWESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTOWE JAZZ FESTIVAL LTD — $5,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $2,845 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTON THEATRE COMPANY INC — $2,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $2,125 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN GAYNOR SCHOOL — $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUFFOLK UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC — $1,095 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $1,060 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $880 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $804 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $660 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetQUOGUE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetQUOGUE FIRE DEPARTMENT — $400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHYHUNGER INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE QUOGUE ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDICAL MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds DAVID AND GISELA KING FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds STOWE JAZZ FESTIVAL LTD
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS
  • Who funds HAMPTON THEATRE COMPANY INC
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN GAYNOR SCHOOL
  • Who funds SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds QUOGUE CHAMBER MUSIC INC
  • Who funds THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
  • Who funds QUOGUE HISTORICAL SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kenneth J Tedaldi Foundation IncNY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kenneth J Tedaldi Foundation Inc · The Bassman Family Charitable Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The King Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Suffolk University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The King Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The King Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph