· Private foundation
The Khaled Hosseini Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $99k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERESDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $80,000 |
| USA FOR UNHCR | $50,000 |
| EMERGENCY USA | $29,500 |
| UNICEF USA | $25,000 |
| TRUST IN EDUCATION | $24,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 32% of The Khaled Hosseini Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 21% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 18% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
United States Association for UNHCR6× · 2018–2024 · $495k · revenue +39%- EUEMERGENCY USA7× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +56%
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF6× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $71k
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +79%- WFWomen for Afghan Women Incone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
IANGEL is an international network dedicated to advancing gender equity and protecting the human and civil rights of women and girls, through peaceful, legal means. IANGEL advances its mission by connecting the lawyers and legal…
Global QRF responds rapidly to changing global security environments by leveraging our strategic partnerships with government, non-governmental organizations, and individuals worldwide to assist and support vulnerable populations from…
MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…
Provide financial assistance to refugees and American citizens that are evacuating conflict areas. Help for Afghanistan provides donations to those individuals and organizations in need of support in Afghanistan and helps settle those that…
We partner closely with community organizations, local nonprofits, resettlement agencies, religious institutions and passionate volunteers focused on helping refugees, asylum-seekers and humanitarian parolees resettle in Southern…
Hope for Her International is dedicated to advocating for a just and peaceful world with a profound emphasis on the rights of women and girls. Our mission is to build a supportive community, foster social entrepreneurship, eradicate…
As a charitable fund, we vet and support grass-roots organizations that are doing impactful work on the ground in Afghanistan and with Afghan refugees around the world. We monitor, evaluate, and audit organizations for the purpose of…
AGFAF helps secure scholarships and provides financial,academic and emotional support to qualified Afghan women seeking college education, graduate or professional school education. AGFAF also provides scholarships to qualified male…
In Afghanistan, in 2021 women were banned from receiving secondary education [Grades 7 - 12]. Then in 2022 women were banned from attending colleges and universities. In 2024 women were then banned from receiving medical training,…
Our mission is to improve the quality of life for Afghan women and children by providing free health services, social services and education to the most vulnerable in Afghanistan.
Panah is a CHARITABLE non-profit foundation with active 501c (3) status. This charity was formed in 2010 to help poor and homeless families by providing various humanitarian services. Panah Charity's mission is to provide aid via different…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Town Cats of Morgan Hill. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY USA ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds TRUST IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Afghan Friends Network ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE TECH INTERACTIVE ↗
- Who funds CREATING HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds REFUGEPOINT INC ↗
- Who funds RAZIAS RAY OF HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
- Who funds Morning Star Development ↗
- Who funds Afghan Connection Inc ↗
- Who funds LAMIA AFGHAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TOWN CATS OF MORGAN HILL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Khaled Hosseini Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.