Skip to content
The Kaleta A Doolin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Kaleta A Doolin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
110
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$6.5MEducation$3.8MPhilanthropy$2.7MHuman Services$2.6MHealth$2.0MReligion$1.0MCivil Rights$991kScience & Tech$715kOther$0
02FY2024 · 110 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k70 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k32 grants · $2.2M
$25,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dia Art Foundation$200,000
Women Donors Network$160,000
Women's Audio Mission$150,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of Am$100,000
Documentary Arts$100,000
Brooklyn Museum$100,000
Center for Reproductive Rights$100,000
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institutio$80,000
National Network to End Domestic Vi$70,000
Methodist Health System Foundation$50,000
Abide Women's Health Services$50,000
Moms First$50,000
Delighted to Doula Birth Service$50,000
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center$50,000
Abortion Fund of Ohio$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Rosa es Rojo: $10k → 5%Susan B Anthony Project: $10k → 9%Court Watch Montgomery: $25k → 8%Para Los Ninos: $88k → 14%Wells International Foundation: $10k → 16%Court Watch Montgomery: $10k → 8%Para Los Ninos: $25k → 14%Women Moving Millions: $125k → 17%Women Moving Millions: $100k → 17%Women Moving Millions: $95k → 17%Women Moving Millions: $75k → 17%Reproductive Freedom for All: $25k → 14%Women Moving Millions: $35k → 17%Women Moving Millions: $20k → 17%Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center: $50k → 14%Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center: $50k → 14%Hope Cottage: $25k → 14%Dallas Area Rape Crisi Center: $20k → 14%Viola's House: $50k → 14%Viola's House: $40k → 14%Viola's House: $25k → 14%Ourcalling: $10k → 14%Ourcalling: $10k → 14%Our Calling: $10k → 14%Ourcalling: $10k → 14%The Brigid Alliance: $50k → 17%The Brigid Alliance: $50k → 17%The Brigid Alliance: $40k → 17%Community Partners of Dallas: $25k → 14%Community Partners of Dallas: $25k → 14%Community Council of Greater Dallas: $25k → 14%Dallas Children's Advocacy Center: $25k → 14%Dallas Children's Advocacy Center: $25k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy: $10k → 14%Our Calling: $10k → 14%Our Calling: $10k → 14%Jonathans Place: $20k → 14%The Concilio: $25k → 14%The Concilio: $25k → 14%The Family Place: $21k → 14%The Family Place: $20k → 14%The Family Place: $10k → 14%Encore Park Dallas: $60k → 14%Hope Supply Co: $25k → 14%Hope Supply Co: $25k → 14%Bachman Lake Together: $25k → 14%Hope Supply company: $15k → 14%Hope Supply Co: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NM
KS
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Kaleta A Doolin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 57% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 53%.

The Kaleta A Doolin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 101 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

101 repeat relationships: 65 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

101
91

Total granted

$17M
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+29%

Still filing today

70%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2022 · $1.9M · revenue +38%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK
    5× · 2017–2023 · $697k · revenue +46%
  • DC
    DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $694k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • A
    Agape
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $210k
  • WC
    Wexner Center Foundation dba Wexner
    one grant, 2023 · $159k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Conversationalist
—
2
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
4
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
5
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
6
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
7
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
8
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
9
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
10
Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media

Transforming global storytelling by using data-driven research, education, and advocacy to mitigate bias, inspiring authentic portrayals in entertainment, advertising, and gaming that reflect the true diversity of the population.

Civil Rights
11
Fos Feminista Fund

Fos feminista fund was formed exclusively for charitable purposes to support, foster, aid, and enhance access to contraception, responsible parenthood, reproductive health, and empowerment of women and shall aid and support the activities…

Health
12
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

161 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 161 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
159/161
Grantees still filing
92/161
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Agape: $1,000,000 · OtherAgapeNational Science Foundation: $750,000 · OtherNational Science FoundationFeeding America: $600,000 · OtherFeeding America+97 more: $5,872,707 · Other+97 moreTHE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER: $1,886,278 · Arts & CultureTHE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTE…DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $694,000 · Arts & CultureDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS IN…Documentary Arts Inc: $660,000 · Arts & CultureDocumentary Arts IncDallas Museum of Art: $426,910 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of ArtTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $422,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF …ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $321,100 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF AR…+27 more: $1,101,831 · Arts & Culture+27 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $1,507,085 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES F…WOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $668,000 · PhilanthropyWOMEN DONORS …BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $461,000 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERI…HEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS: $120,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50,000 · PhilanthropyLUMIN EDUCATION: $1,320,000 · EducationLUMIN EDUCAT…YOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK: $697,312 · EducationYOUNG WOMEN'…The OpEd Project Public Knowledge Fund Inc: $154,000 · EducationThe OpEd Pro…+13 more: $469,289 · Education+13 moreWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $450,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesDallas Area Rape Crisis Center: $120,000 · Human ServicesVIOLAS HOUSE: $115,000 · Human ServicesPARA LOS NINOS: $112,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $100,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesHOPE SUPPLY CO: $95,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $66,000 · Human Services+14 more: $551,000 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $245,000 · HealthMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC: $240,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $200,000 · HealthABIDE WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES: $165,000 · HealthSIMPLY GRACE: $160,000 · HealthTrust Women Foundation Inc: $140,000 · HealthRepro TLC: $120,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100,000 · HealthDELIGHTED TO DOULA BIRTH SERVICES: $100,000 · HealthMEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE: $70,000 · Health+7 more: $185,604 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $266,000 · Civil RightsJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $240,000 · Civil RightsUltraViolet Education Fund: $105,000 · Civil RightsERA COALITION INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsFUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsOPERATION PERIOD: $25,000 · Civil Rights
Other$8,222,707Arts & Culture$5,512,619Philanthropy$2,806,085Education$2,640,601Human Services$1,844,500Health$1,725,604Civil Rights$711,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER: $1,886,278 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $1,507,085 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLUMIN EDUCATION: $1,320,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK: $697,312 over 5y, 11% of budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $694,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $668,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetDocumentary Arts Inc: $660,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetFeeding America: $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $450,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $426,910 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $422,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $321,100 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $266,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $245,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC: $240,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $240,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetWomens Audio Mission: $225,700 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FRIENDS PLACE: $173,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetABIDE WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES: $165,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetSIMPLY GRACE: $160,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $160,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $160,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe OpEd Project Public Knowledge Fund Inc: $154,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetBELIEVE IN STUDENTS INC: $143,250 over 2y, 22% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $140,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $140,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetINDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING: $140,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRepro TLC: $120,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetDallas Area Rape Crisis Center: $120,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetHEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS: $120,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetVIOLAS HOUSE: $115,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $112,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS BLACK DANCE THEATRE INC: $108,250 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUltraViolet Education Fund: $105,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWings of a Butterfly: $105,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $100,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROMISE HOUSE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetVickery Trading Company Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetDeeds Not Words: $100,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetDELIGHTED TO DOULA BIRTH SERVICES: $100,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $95,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $80,064 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS: $75,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHammer Museum Inc: $75,000 over 5y, 52% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUMIN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN DONORS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Documentary Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Womens Audio Mission ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR FRIENDS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds ABIDE WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SIMPLY GRACE ↗
  • Who funds National Network to End Domestic Violence Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds The OpEd Project Public Knowledge Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds BELIEVE IN STUDENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds Repro TLC ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Women's Foundat…United Way of Metropo…Communities Foundatio…The Dallas FoundationW P & Bulah Luse Foun…Hillcrest FoundationThe Addy FoundationThe Moody FoundationKatherine C Carmody C…Texas Instruments Fou…The Rees-Jones Founda…Hoblitzelle Foundation
Texas Women's FoundationTX66.2× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Women's Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The Addy Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kaleta A Doolin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kaleta A Doolin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
44report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kaleta A Doolin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Kaleta A Doolin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kaleta A Doolin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home