Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joshua M and Inette S Brown Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$310kHealth$264kPhilanthropy$161kCivil Rights$127kInternational$81kAnimals$77kArts & Culture$58kCrime & Legal$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$80k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$40,000
UT FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
HADDASAH KANSAS CITY CHAPTER$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE GIVING FDN: $250 → 12%THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FAMILY PLACE: $1k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OR
CA
CO
KS
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$951k · 21 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
62

Total granted

$951k
$303k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+19%

Still filing today

48%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $125k · revenue +48%
  • BH
    Baylor Health Care System Foundation
    4× · 2019–2022 · $95k · revenue +44%
  • FF
    Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $80k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE BS&W HEALTH - KINKEADE CAMPUS FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $70k
  • TO
    THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +302%
  • TL
    TODD & LAURIE PLATT SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
2
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
3
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
6
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
7
Dallas Bar Association

The Dallas Bar Association is a nonprofit corporation chartered by the State of Texas to protect and advance the professional interests of persons licensed to practice law in the Dallas area, to improve the relations between the Bench, the…

—
8
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
9
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
10
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
11
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
12
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
27/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF DALLAS: $157,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DALLASCENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTH: $100,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTHUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $80,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE BS&W HEALTH - KINKEADE CAMPUS FUND: $70,000 · OtherCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE BS&W HEALTH - KINKEADE CAMPUS FUNDUT SCHOOL OF LAW: $44,500 · OtherUT SCHOOL OF LAWMCCOMBS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $40,000 · OtherCRISTO REY DALLAS: $36,600 · OtherADL: $27,900 · Other+58 more: $229,415 · Other+58 moreBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $95,000 · HealthBaylor Heal…MAYO CLINIC: $20,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $11,000 · HealthLUPUS RESEA…+5 more: $7,100 · Health+5 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $125,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMA…Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $80,000 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalThe McCombs School of Business Foundation: $70,000 · EducationDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $40,030 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS CONTEMPORARY: $2,990 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $3,470 · Arts & CultureTHE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human Services
Other$785,915Health$133,100Civil Rights$125,000International$80,500Education$70,000Arts & Culture$56,490Human Services$29,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe McCombs School of Business Foundation: $70,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $40,030 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Family Place: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTAYING ALIVE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS CONTEMPORARY: $2,990 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBrighter Bites Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $1,564 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS ARCHITECTURE FORUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Jewish Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $620 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KATY TRAIL INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESERVATION DALLAS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
  • Who funds The McCombs School of Business Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds STAYING ALIVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CONTEMPORARY ↗
  • Who funds Brighter Bites Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Women's Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Eugene McDermott Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Harry S Moss Foundation · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joshua M and Inette S Brown Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joshua M and Inette S Brown Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joshua M and Inette S Brown Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Joshua M and Inette S Brown Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joshua M and Inette S Brown Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph