Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joseph and Rose Rontal Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$135k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The Joseph and Rose Rontal Foundation’s FY2026 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2025, the last year The Joseph and Rose Rontal Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $152k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
16
’18
6
’19
3
’20
2
’21
6
’22
8
’23
7
’24
5
’25
0
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Health$252kEnvironment$98kArts & Culture$90kPhilanthropy$11kEducation$9kRecreation & Sports$7kCommunity Improvement$5kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF MICHIGAN MEDICINE$135,000
STAMPS SCHOOL OF ART AND DESIGN$10,000
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS$1,000
CHIARTS FOUNDATION$300
TORCH LAKE PROTECTION ALLIANCE$125
THREE LAKES ASSOCIATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%JARC: $1k → 8%JARC: $1k → 8%CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $650 → 14%CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $600 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 23 repeat orgs$511k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call). Read against FY2025, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
44

Total granted

$357k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+87%

Still filing today

52%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $401k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +202%
  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    4× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +34%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LARYNGOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE LAND CONSE
    one grant, 2021 · $38k
  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +93%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSURGERY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
12
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
24/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE FUND: $401,021 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE FUNDUNIV OF MICHIGAN MEDICINE: $200,000 · OtherUNIV OF MICHIGAN MEDICINESTAMPS SCHOOL OF ART AND DESIGN: $40,000 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE LAND CONSERVANCY: $40,000 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE LAND CONSE: $37,500 · Other+46 more: $88,230 · Other+46 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $401,021 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+2 more: $10,454 · PhilanthropyDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $25,500 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $4,150 · Arts & CultureMarwen Foundation Inc: $1,700 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $20,000 · Environment+1 more: $450 · EnvironmentJARC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $1,250 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $1,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $950 · EducationChiArts Foundation: $600 · EducationACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $500 · EducationBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL: $250 · EducationBEYOND BASICS: $250 · EducationNorthwestern University: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$806,751Philanthropy$411,475Arts & Culture$31,850Environment$20,450Human Services$3,750Education$3,550Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $25,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $19,250 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $10,254 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $4,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LARYNGOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetJARC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarwen Foundation Inc: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChiArts Foundation: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORCH LAKE PROTECTION ALLIANCE: $450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHREE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BASICS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY ILLINOIS: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT2NEPAL FOUNDATION: $175 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SPASMODIC DYSPHONIA ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LARYNGOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds Marwen Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ChiArts Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Jewish FoundationMI15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Chicago Community Trust · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph and Rose Rontal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph and Rose Rontal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph and Rose Rontal’s filings →

More from the funding graph