· Private foundation
The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of THE ANDREA AND LAWRENCE WOLFE FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $485k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $120,000 |
| GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $85,000 |
| BRILLIANT DETROIT | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY | $55,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METRO DETROIT | $25,500 |
| HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| PROJECT HEALTHY COMMUNITY | $25,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION | $18,000 |
| HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER | $11,000 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMBAM | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE (JDC) | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
71 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BRILLIANT DETROIT4× · 2017–2024 · $189k · revenue +430%- HMHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +133%
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC6× · 2019–2024 · $141k · revenue +234%
Funded once
- JUJERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGEone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -40%
- OMOPENDOR MEDIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $36k · revenue +109%
- JAJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAELone grant, 2023 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…
The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Inspire students to be active in jewish life.
Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors
The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…
Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.
To further jewish historical education among youths
To nurture the development of knowledgeable, caring and committed Jewish children in a dynamic learning environment. Through exceptional general and Judaic studies and Hebrew language immersion, students create a meaningful and joyous…
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Detroit Jewish News Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds BERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG ↗
- Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
- Who funds CABARET 313 INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Marvin and Betty Danto Family Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · The Ravitz Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · The D Dan and Betty Kahn Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust · The Jerold and Ellen Minkin Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.