Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The John Russell Thomas Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$222kHealth$198kReligion$126kHuman Services$79kPhilanthropy$65kInternational$32kCommunity Improvement$31kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$105,000
CENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$25,000
PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC$15,000
STEPS MINISTRIES$12,000
LAKE MARTIN AREA UNITED WAY$10,000
BAYLOR SCHOOL$5,000
THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIOP$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $3k → 8%THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIOP: $6k → 16%THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIOP: $3k → 16%PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC: $38k → 16%PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC: $15k → 16%PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC: $5k → 16%PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC: $5k → 16%PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC: $5k → 16%PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC: $5k → 16%PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC: $4k → 16%PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$620k · 16 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$620k
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+143%

Still filing today

56%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    STEPS MINISTRIES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $68k · revenue +45%
  • LM
    LAKE MARTIN AREA UNITED WAY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +44%
  • SC
    SOZO CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $32k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • US
    UAB SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • CM
    CANTERBURY METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • ST
    SKY'S THE LIMIT FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +143%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
2
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
3
Christian Services for Children in Alabama

The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.

4
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
5
American Academic Leadership Institute Inc

Services include, but are not limited to, identification and development of academic leadership talent and programs enabling them to be successful in their roles and to advance the institutions they serve; consultation to academic leaders…

Education
6
Landmark Christian School

Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

7
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
8
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
9
Southern Research Institute

To offer research and technology services to support the life sciences, energy, and environmental protection industries. the organization pursues entrepreneurial and collaborative initiatives to develop and maintain a pipeline of…

Science & Tech
10
A Best Practices Center

The alabama best practices center helps teachers and administrators develop the competence, commitment and courage to do whatever it takes to improve student learning.

Education
11
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

12
Summit Ministries Inc

Summit ministries is an educational christian ministry with the purpose of equipping tomorrow's servant leaders to analyze competing worldviews and champion the christian faith, inspiring each one to love god with all his heart, soul,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Harbor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alexander City Schools Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA — $169,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAUAB SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $100,000 · OtherUAB SCHOOL OF MEDICINEGREAT BETHEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH — $80,000 · OtherGREAT BETHEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCHLAKE MARTIN AREA UNITED WAY — $65,000 · OtherLAKE MARTIN AREA UNITED WAYALEXANDER CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $31,250 · OtherALEXANDER CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCECENTRAL ALABAMA COMM COLLEGE — $25,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $21,667 · OtherO'NEAL CANCER CENTER — $20,000 · Other+9 more — $19,850 · OtherPASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC — $78,500 · Human ServicesPASTORAL COUN…THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FO…+1 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesSTEPS MINISTRIES — $68,000 · HealthSTEPS MINIS…CHILDREN'S HARBOR INC — $7,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S …SOZO CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL — $32,000 · InternationalBAYLOR SCHOOL — $15,500 · EducationALEXANDER CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,500 · Education
Other$531,767Human Services$90,000Health$75,000International$32,000Education$26,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC — $78,500 over 8y, 26% of budgetSTEPS MINISTRIES — $68,000 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetLAKE MARTIN AREA UNITED WAY — $65,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetSOZO CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL — $32,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBAYLOR SCHOOL — $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALEXANDER CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HARBOR INC — $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PASTORAL COUNSELING AND TRAINING CENTER INC
  • Who funds STEPS MINISTRIES
  • Who funds LAKE MARTIN AREA UNITED WAY
  • Who funds SOZO CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds BAYLOR SCHOOL
  • Who funds ALEXANDER CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HARBOR INC
  • Who funds SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The John Russell Thomas Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The John Russell Thomas Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The John Russell Thomas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph