Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jinks Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$181k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$354kEnvironment$164kYouth Development$136kHuman Services$91kScience & Tech$85kHealth$54kAnimals$40kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STETSON UNIVERSITY$66,500
UGA FOUNDATION$25,000
UGA FOUNDATION$25,000
INSTITUTE FOR WATER & ENVIRONMENTAL$25,000
BEARINGS BIKE SHOP$25,000
UNG FOUNDATION$2,500
TOMMY NOBIS CENTER$2,500
EAGLE RANCH$2,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,500
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$1,000
ATLANTA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $34k → 13%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $33k → 13%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $33k → 13%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $25k → 13%CALVARY CHILDRENS HOME: $3k → 8%CALVARY CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 8%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$825k · 24 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
17

Total granted

$825k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    STETSON UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $227k · revenue +17%
  • BB
    BEARINGS BIKE SHOP INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +392%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF GA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • GN
    GA NATURAL RESOURCES FDTN
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • MO
    MT OLIVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augusta Health Care Inc

The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.

Health
2
Georgia Biosciences Organization Inc

The mission of georgia biosciences organization is to advance the life sciences industry in georgia by promoting innovation, workforce development, and public understanding of its impact on the economy, health, and quality of life. the…

Community Improvement
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Tall Timbers Research Inc

The mission of tall timbers research,inc. is to foster exemplary land stewardship through research, conservation and education.our primary research focus is the ecology of fire and natural resource management including bobwhite quail and…

Science & Tech
5
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
6
Georgia Veterinary Medical Association I

The georgia veterinary medical association is committed to advancing the veterinary medical profession and supporting the veterinarian's role in improving animal and public health.

7
Tenngreen Land Conservancy

The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.

Recreation & Sports
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
10
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
11
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Union Hill Cemetery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Animal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Substance Abuse TreatmentDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Arts OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%9%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr9%18%35–55yr13%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr14%8%20–35yr9%9%35–55yr13%59%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
19%
10,946/58,272

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UGSRF INC — $75,000 · OtherUGSRF INCUNIVERSITY OF GA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GA FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY — $38,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient — $30,216 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGEORGIA NATURAL RESOURCES FDTN INC — $28,429 · OtherGEORGIA NATURAL RESOURCES FDTN INCINSTITUTE FOR WATER & ENVIRONMENTAL — $25,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR WATER & ENVIRONMENTALATLANTA LYRIC THEATRE INC — $16,000 · OtherGA NATURAL RESOURCES FDTN — $15,304 · Other+18 more — $57,000 · Other+18 moreSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC — $226,500 · EducationSTETSON UNIVERSITY INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $62,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION+2 more — $20,000 · Education+2 moreBEARINGS BIKE SHOP INC — $130,000 · Human ServicesBEARINGS BIKE S…+1 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $37,500 · HealthST JUDE C…EAGLE RANCH INC — $35,000 · HealthEAGLE RAN…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $4,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $27,000 · EnvironmentLAKE LANIER ASSOCIATION INC — $22,500 · EnvironmentGEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentOne Hundred Miles Inc — $5,000 · EnvironmentATLANTA BOXER RESCUE INC — $35,000 · AnimalsAHIMSA HOUSE INC — $3,500 · Animals+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsNOBIS WORKS INC — $10,000 · Employment
Other$335,449Education$309,000Human Services$134,000Health$77,000Environment$64,500Animals$39,500Employment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC — $226,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEARINGS BIKE SHOP INC — $130,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $62,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $37,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA BOXER RESCUE INC — $35,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetEAGLE RANCH INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $27,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLAKE LANIER ASSOCIATION INC — $22,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetATLANTA LYRIC THEATRE INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNOBIS WORKS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Extension Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAHIMSA HOUSE INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HOSPICE & HOPE HOUSE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEA PINES FOREST PRESERVE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTERN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STETSON UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds BEARINGS BIKE SHOP INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds ATLANTA BOXER RESCUE INC
  • Who funds EAGLE RANCH INC
  • Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds LAKE LANIER ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ATLANTA LYRIC THEATRE INC
  • Who funds NOBIS WORKS INC
  • Who funds TOMMY NOBIS CENTER INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds GEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc
  • Who funds One Hundred Miles Inc
  • Who funds W-Underdogs Inc
  • Who funds The Extension Inc
  • Who funds CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AHIMSA HOUSE INC
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HOSPICE & HOPE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds SEA PINES FOREST PRESERVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc
  • Who funds TERN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Choate Foundation (Fka Choate Bridges Foundation) · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jinks Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Stetson University Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jinks Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Jinks Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph