Skip to content
The Jin Hua Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Jin Hua Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$760k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$270k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$6.3MHealth$1.5MInternational$215kHuman Services$185kReligion$172kArts & Culture$40kFood & Nutrition$25kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $395k
  • $250k+1 grant · $270k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALTON SCHOOL$270,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$180,000
THE ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL$85,000
BREARLEY SCHOOL$80,000
ASU FOUNDATION$50,000
FOUNDATION FOR EASTERN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$35,000
MIKE GONNELLI CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC$20,000
LEXINGTON SCHOOL AND CENTER FOR THE DEAF$20,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $40k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $40k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $30k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NJ
CT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.3M · 18 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$8.3M
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-1%

Still filing today

72%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BREARLEY SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +8%
  • EM
    ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +28%
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • TS
    The Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $29k · revenue -19%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ATLANTA
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • FOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dwight-Englewood School; the most unlike its peers is Manhattan School of Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $3,230,000 · EducationTHE BREARLEY SCHOOLELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC: $2,339,500 · EducationELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INCDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $470,000 · EducationDALTON SCHOOLS INC+3 more: $200,000 · EducationNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,130,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEA…CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $160,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FO…BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC: $112,000 · HealthBERGEN VOLUNTEER ME…+3 more: $53,655 · HealthJCC ON THE PALISADES: $171,929 · OtherLEXINGTON SCHOOL AND CENTER FOR THE DEAF: $80,000 · OtherGOALS BEYOND THE NET: $40,000 · OtherHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ATLANTA: $25,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC: $25,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $20,000 · Other+3 more: $25,000 · OtherSTUF UNITED FUND INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $120,000 · Human ServicesMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureMIKE GONNELLI CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · Public Benefit
Education$6,239,500Health$1,455,655Other$454,929Philanthropy$200,000Human Services$120,000Arts & Culture$40,000Public Benefit$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $3,230,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC: $2,339,500 over 7y, 10% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,130,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $470,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTUF UNITED FUND INC: $200,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFoundation for Eastern Christian School Association Inc: $140,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $120,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC: $112,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThe Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc: $28,655 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIKE GONNELLI CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetDWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENDURING HEARTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BREARLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds DALTON SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds STUF UNITED FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Eastern Christian School Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds The Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MIKE GONNELLI CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ENDURING HEARTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank Foundat…Community Foundation …The Bank of America C…Jewish Communal FundThe Pfizer Foundation…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…
Columbia Bank FoundationNJ13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jin Hua Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jin Hua Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Bergen Family Center: 25% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jin Hua’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home