· Private foundation
The Jenzabar Foundation Inc
TO FUND EDUCATIONAL, CHARITABLE, LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES CARRIED ON BY COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AND THEIR STUDENT CLUBS AND CAMPUS ORGANIZATIONS.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k7 grants · $190k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $618k
- $250k+2 grants · $795k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALL GIRLS ALLOWED | $525,000 |
| TRUE SOJOURNERS | $270,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION | $200,000 |
| THE ROSSER FOUNDATION | $187,500 |
| HUMANITARIAN CHINA | $100,000 |
| GTI HOPE | $80,000 |
| NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION | $50,000 |
| GIRLS DIGNITY FOR NATION | $35,960 |
| CENTENARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD | $35,000 |
| THE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER | $29,000 |
| ONE FAMILY INC | $25,000 |
| MILLENNIUM CAMPUS NETWORK INC | $25,000 |
| THRIVE NEW ENGLAND | $25,000 |
| MERCY OUTREACH FELLOWSHIP | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $888k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AGALL GIRLS ALLOWED INC6× · 2019–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +223% · 100% of their budget
- OFONE FAMILY INC5× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +93%
BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +47%
Funded once
CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +11%- RPROXBURY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $15k
- CFCRIMSON FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Running a private school.
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
To inspire and educate students to become socially aware leaders and innovators who positively impact their communities around the world
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
Furthering economic development and education through training unemployed and underemployed individuals for careers in the manufacturing sector.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Union Inc and the most unlike its peers is All Girls Allowed Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALL GIRLS ALLOWED INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds HUMANITARIAN CHINA ↗
- Who funds ONE FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds GTI HOPE ↗
- Who funds BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE NEW ENGLAND ↗
- Who funds MILLENNIUM CAMPUS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds ROOT CAPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CRIMSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEWTOWNE SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN UNION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · All Girls Allowed Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jenzabar Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Immigrant Learning Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- One Family Inc — 1% of income from government
- Central Catholic High School of Lawrence Inc — 0% of income from government
- Buckingham Browne & Nichols School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jenzabar Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Jenzabar Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.