Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

All Girls Allowed Inc

All girls allowed, inc.

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

International$475kEducation$287kReligion$89kHuman Services$85kCrime & Legal$83kCivil Rights$55kCommunity Improvement$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
ROUTE ONE MINISTRY$40,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COALITION AGAINST TRAFFIC IN WOMEN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE NATHAN PROJECT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,547
CULTURE REFRAMED$55
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ROUTE ONE MINISTRY: $40k → 16%ONE FAMILY: $25k → 16%ONE FAMILY: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
SD
PA
NJ
CA
VA
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 66% of All Girls Allowed Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 7% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

All Girls Allowed Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$519k · 5 repeat orgs$685k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$519k
$594k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+41%

Still filing today

60%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GTI HOPE
    3× · 2020–2023 · $140k · revenue +42%
  • PS
    PEER SERVANTS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $140k · revenue +42%
  • OF
    ONE FAMILY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • EG
    EMMANUEL GOSPEL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $112k
  • TI
    THE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $103k · revenue -26%
  • AM
    AsOne Ministriesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +501%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
2
Asha Partners

To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.

Religion
3
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
6
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
7
Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services
8
Global Hope

Global hope exists to empower vulnerable women in regions impacted by conflict and provide hope through emergency response, education, empowerment and protection, economic development, and community engagement so that women are liberated,…

International
9
GlobalServant Ministries Inc

Offers counsel, formal & informal teaching served in a pastoral role, mentored groups,filled numerous speaking invitations, conducted discipling groups & provided spiritual, emotional and

Religion
10
Global Outreach Inc

To share Christian compassion and love in an effort to alleviate spiritual, physical, emotional and mental suffering around the world. We help care for orphans and vulnerable children, teens and women in need. We provide training and…

International
11
Serve the Global Church Inc

To serve, strengthen, and support the ministry authority of partner Christian churches in the global South and East. Specifically including Bible translation into minority languages and compassionate response to local emergencies.

International
12
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Justice Mission and the most unlike its peers is SISTER2SISTER. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $183,604 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEMMANUEL GOSPEL CENTER INC — $112,000 · OtherEMMANUEL GOSPEL CENTER INCTHE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC — $103,068 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INCVARIOUS — $71,215 · OtherVARIOUSNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL — $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL+11 more — $73,872 · Other+11 morePEER SERVANTS INC — $140,000 · InternationalPEER SERVANTS INCTEACH RWANDA — $50,000 · InternationalTEACH RWANDAHUMANITARIAN CHINA — $50,000 · InternationalHUMANITARIAN CHINA+1 more — $7,500 · InternationalAsOne Ministries — $100,000 · Human ServicesAsOne MinistriesONE FAMILY INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesONE FAMILY INCRoute One Ministry — $40,000 · Human ServicesRoute One Ministr…GTI HOPE — $140,000 · EducationGTI HOPEThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries — $34,500 · PhilanthropySISTER2SISTER — $3,000 · HealthCULTURE REFRAMED INC — $55 · Youth Development
Other$593,759International$247,500Human Services$185,000Education$140,000Philanthropy$34,500Health$3,000Youth Development$55

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGTI HOPE — $140,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetPEER SERVANTS INC — $140,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC — $103,068 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAsOne Ministries — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTEACH RWANDA — $50,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetHUMANITARIAN CHINA — $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetONE FAMILY INC — $45,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRoute One Ministry — $40,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries — $34,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLight of Life Ministries — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER2SISTER — $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCULTURE REFRAMED INC — $55 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GTI HOPE
  • Who funds PEER SERVANTS INC
  • Who funds THE IMMIGRANT LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds AsOne Ministries
  • Who funds TEACH RWANDA
  • Who funds HUMANITARIAN CHINA
  • Who funds ONE FAMILY INC
  • Who funds Route One Ministry
  • Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
  • Who funds Light of Life Ministries
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
  • Who funds SISTER2SISTER
  • Who funds CULTURE REFRAMED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Jenzabar Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization All Girls Allowed Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 34%
  • The Immigrant Learning Center Inc34% of income from government
  • One Family Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to All Girls Allowed Inc?

Find your warmest path to All Girls Allowed Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph