Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jen-Hsun & Lori Huang Foundation % Frank Rimerman Co LLP

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$41M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of The Jen-Hsun & Lori Huang Foundation % Frank Rimerman Co LLP’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
1
’18
2
’19
2
’20
2
’21
0
’22
3
’23
6
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$185MEducation$57MHealth$16MInternational$1.1MFood & Nutrition$967kPublic Benefit$583kArts & Culture$500kEnvironment$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $311k
  • $250k+8 grants · $126M
$516,711
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$41,426,125
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$41,071,900
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$20,535,950
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$9,938,808
CRISIS TEXT LINE$9,009,320
CRISIS TEXT LINE$1,742,620
MENTAL HEALTH INNOVATIONS$1,676,952
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$516,711
COLLEGE OF ADAPTIVE ARTS$100,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERSMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES$100,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$61,065
KAHA KUKAHI FOUNDATION$50,000
COLLEGE TRACK$25,000
HOPE FOR PDCD FOUNDATION$10,000
ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CITY YEAR SAN JOSESILICON VALLEY: $583k → 8%COLLEGE TRACK: $25k → 10%THE GE FORCE FUND: $27.0M → 10%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM: $250k → 12%HOPE FOR PDCD FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%LIVING THROUGH GIVING FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%KAHA KUKAHI FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $900k → 17%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $20.5M → 18%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 19%COLLEGE OF ADAPTIVE ARTS: $100k → 8%THE GE FORCE FUND: $17.6M → 10%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $100k → 12%LIVING THROUGH GIVING FOUNDATION: $145k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERSMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES: $100k → 17%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $9.9M → 18%LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $10k → 8%THE GE FORCE FUND: $11.3M → 10%LIVING THROUGH GIVING FOUNDATION: $105k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $9.9M → 18%SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $277k → 8%THE GE FORCE FUND: $9.7M → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND: $10k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $9.6M → 18%SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $517k → 8%THE GE FORCE FUND: $1.7M → 10%FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $3.1M → 18%SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $50k → 8%THE GE FORCE FUND: $40k → 10%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $352k → 18%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 8%TIDES CENTER DEPOSITORY: $500k → 10%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $281k → 18%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%ASIA SOCIETY: $100k → 10%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $266k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $241k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $92k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $61k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 18%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$139M · 6 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$139M
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CRISIS TEXT LINE INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $13M · revenue +289%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $567k · revenue +8%
  • MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $350k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +64%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $900k · revenue -51%
  • CITY YEAR INC
    one grant, 2017 · $583k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
6
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hope for Pdcd Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $184,307,694 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+2 more — $327,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GE FORCE FUND — $67,410,168 · OtherTHE GE FORCE FUNDOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY — $54,616,473 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY+8 more — $4,763,719 · OtherCRISIS TEXT LINE INC — $13,262,229 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,076,696 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 · Education+1 more — $25,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $900,000 · InternationalTHE ASIA SOCIETY — $100,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100,000 · InternationalSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $566,711 · Food & NutritionLIVING THROUGH GIVING FOUNDATION — $400,000 · Food & NutritionMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $350,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$184,634,694Other$126,790,360Health$13,272,229Education$2,101,696International$1,100,000Food & Nutrition$966,711Animals$350,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $184,307,694 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCRISIS TEXT LINE INC — $13,262,229 over 3y, 24% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,076,696 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $900,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $583,333 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $566,711 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIVING THROUGH GIVING FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $277,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF ADAPTIVE ARTS — $100,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope for PDCD Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jen-Hsun & Lori Huang Foundation % Frank Rimerman Co LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines