Skip to content
The Janszen Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Janszen Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$254kHuman Services$34kInternational$17kRecreation & Sports$7kScience & Tech$4kEducation$3kHealth$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$1,100
Median grant
7
States reached
$100k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEBURNE BIBLE CHURCH$17,600
KANAKUK INSTITUTE$2,200
CLEBURNE BIBLE CHURCH BENEVOLEN$1,900
FIRST PRIORTY OF AMERICA$1,900
CLEBURNE BIBLE CHURCH BUILDING$1,800
CLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER$1,700
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP$1,100
JERSUSALEM INSTITUE FOR JUSTICE$1,100
KCBI$1,100
SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$1,100
CHOSEN PEOPLE MINISTRIES$1,100
SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,100
K-LIFE$1,100
CRU$1,100
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $300 → 10%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $700 → 20%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $300 → 10%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $500 → 20%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $400 → 20%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $350 → 20%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $300 → 20%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $300 → 10%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
CO
MO
VA
NC
SC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$315k · 29 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
2

Total granted

$315k
$500

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +54%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +106%
  • TK
    THE KANAKUK INSTITUTE
    2× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +242%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $400
  • SL
    ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
2
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
3
Central Christian College of the Bible

Central christian college of the bible (central) exists to develop servant-leaders for the church. as a traditional undergraduate bible college of the restoration movement, central equips faithful men and women for leadership ministry.

Education
4
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
5
Calvary Baptist School of Lansdale

Calvary baptist school exists to educate students with a biblical worldview and support families as they train up their children in truth, all to the glory of god.

Education
6
Children's Christian School

To aid children in achieving individual academic success while imparting moral and spiritual training through a bible-based curriculum.

Education
7
Fresno Christian Schools

Equip young people for life and service for jesus christ through biblical foundations, christ-like character development, and academic preparation in partnership with the home and local church.

Education
8
Child Evangelism Fellowship of West Texas

CEF is a Bible-centered worldwide organization composed of born-again believers whose purpose is to evangelize boys and girls with the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and to establish (disciple) them in the Word of God and in a local…

—
9
Christ Life Academy

Christ life academy is a kingdom education school, partnering with christian parents in their role of educating and discipling their children, by providing academic excellence and training students to think biblically and critically in all…

Education
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
Christian Central Academy

Christian central academy is an independent, inter-denominational college preparatory christian school for students in kindergarten through grade twelve.

Education
12
Calvary Christian Schools

Provide an exemplary christ-centered education equipping students with truths, knowledge, skills and values that advance the pursuit of god's purpose for their lives.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Evangelism Fellowship Inc; the most unlike its peers is East Cleburne Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEBURNE BIBLE CHURCH: $196,350 · OtherCLEBURNE BIBLE CHURCHSTRATIGIC MISSION PARTNERS: $11,850 · Other+26 more: $89,800 · Other+26 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,050 · ReligionTHE KANAKUK INSTITUTE: $2,900 · ReligionDr James Dobson Family Institute: $2,400 · ReligionINSIGHT FOR LIVING: $2,100 · ReligionISRAEL MEDIA MINISTRIES INC: $1,100 · ReligionKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $900 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,600 · Youth DevelopmentCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC: $1,100 · Youth DevelopmentCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $2,250 · Human ServicesEast Cleburne Community Center: $1,100 · Human Services
Other$298,000Religion$14,450Youth Development$6,700Human Services$3,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KANAKUK INSTITUTE: $2,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER: $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDr James Dobson Family Institute: $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING: $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL MEDIA MINISTRIES INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEast Cleburne Community Center: $1,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEBURNE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE KANAKUK INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Dr James Dobson Family Institute ↗
  • Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL MEDIA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds East Cleburne Community Center ↗
  • Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CLEBURNE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…Servant FoundationThe Ayco Charitable F…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Christian Community Foundation IncCO12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Janszen Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Janszen Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Janszen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home