Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James W Davis Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$430k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.7MHuman Services$238kYouth Development$159kFood & Nutrition$138kReligion$115kPhilanthropy$55kHousing & Shelter$20kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $320k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$160,000
GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY$160,000
FIFTH STREET MINISTRIES$35,000
POWER CROSS$30,000
IREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$15,000
PURPLE HEART HOMES$5,000
GOODWILL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CTR$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%GOODWILL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CTR: $5k → 9%FIRST TEE CHARLOTTE: $150 → 10%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $180k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $160k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $180k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $160k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $180k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $160k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEG: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $160k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEG: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $130k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEG: $120k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $130k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEG: $120k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $35k → 9%POWER CROSS: $30k → 9%POWER CROSS: $30k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $20k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $20k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $12k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $12k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%THE ELDER CENTER: $10k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%PURPLE HEART HOMES: $5k → 9%YMCA OF STATESVILLE: $5k → 9%PURPLE HEART HOMES: $5k → 9%PURPLE HEART HOMES: $5k → 9%POWER CROSS: $5k → 9%PURPLE HEART HOMES: $5k → 9%YMCA OF STATESVILLE: $5k → 9%YMCA OF STATESVILLE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.5M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+24%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GU
    GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +15%
  • DI
    DIAKONOS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $228k · revenue +74%
  • IC
    IREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • EC
    Elder Center Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $150
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education
2
Wingate University

A comprehensive educational institution offering baccalaureate, masters, and doctoral degrees.

Education
3
Southern Wesleyan University

Challenging students to be dedicated scholars and leaders who impact the world for Christ.

Education
4
Central Piedmont Community College

Central piedmont community college will be a champion of students, a catalyst for opportunity, and an exceptional provider of learning experiences that transform lives and strengthen our community. the college facilitates student learning,…

Education
5
Meredith College

Founded in 1891, meredith is one of the largest women's colleges in the southeast. meredith offers comprehensive liberal arts and professional studies for undergraduate women. at the graduate level, meredith offers co-educational mba,…

Education
6
Providence Christian College

The college provides a post-secondary liberal arts education from a historic Reformed Christian Perspective.

Education
7
Davidson-Davie Community College

To provide scholarships and other forms of support for the students of davidson-davie community college.

—
8
Elon University

Elon university's mission is to transform the mind, body, and spirit and encourage freedom of thought and liberty of conscience. the university provides a liberal arts undergraduate curriculum and graduate programs.

Education
9
North Carolina State University

Supports, by financial assistance and otherwise, the various colleges within the university, the libraries, and other university-connected functions.

Education
10
Charlotte Christian College &

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
11
Tennessee Wesleyan University

Four-year liberal arts college

Education
12
East Carolina University Educational

The mission of the east carolina university educational foundation, inc., d/b/a the pirate club, is to be the friend-raising and fund-raising arm of east carolina university's division i athletics program, representing the highest…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iredell Christian Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gardner-Webb University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $770,000 · OtherMITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $540,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $159,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB+4 more: $30,150 · OtherGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $1,420,000 · EducationGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITYDIAKONOS INC: $228,000 · Human ServicesDIAKONOS IN…IREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $138,000 · Human ServicesIREDELL CHR…POWER CROSS: $115,000 · ReligionUnited Way of Iredell County Inc: $55,000 · PhilanthropyPURPLE HEART HOMES INC: $20,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,499,150Education$1,420,000Human Services$366,000Religion$115,000Philanthropy$55,000Public Benefit$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $1,420,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDIAKONOS INC: $228,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetIREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $138,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetPOWER CROSS: $115,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUnited Way of Iredell County Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPURPLE HEART HOMES INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DIAKONOS INC ↗
  • Who funds IREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds POWER CROSS ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Iredell County Inc ↗
  • Who funds PURPLE HEART HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Elder Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Iredell County Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Cashion Family Foundation Inc · Wilson Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James W Davis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James W Davis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The James W Davis Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The James W Davis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James W Davis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph