Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The James W Davis Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$430k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.7MHuman Services$238kYouth Development$159kFood & Nutrition$138kReligion$115kPhilanthropy$55kHousing & Shelter$20kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $320k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY$160,000
MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$160,000
FIFTH STREET MINISTRIES$35,000
POWER CROSS$30,000
IREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$15,000
PURPLE HEART HOMES$5,000
GOODWILL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CTR$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%GOODWILL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CTR: $5k → 9%FIRST TEE CHARLOTTE: $150 → 10%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $180k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $160k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $180k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $160k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $180k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $160k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $160k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEG: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEG: $150k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $130k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEG: $120k → 9%GARDNER WEBB UNIVERSITY: $130k → 17%MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEG: $120k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $35k → 9%POWER CROSS: $30k → 9%POWER CROSS: $30k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $20k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $20k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $12k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $12k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%THE ELDER CENTER: $10k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%POWER CROSS: $10k → 9%PURPLE HEART HOMES: $5k → 9%PURPLE HEART HOMES: $5k → 9%POWER CROSS: $5k → 9%PURPLE HEART HOMES: $5k → 9%PURPLE HEART HOMES: $5k → 9%YMCA OF STATESVILLE: $5k → 9%YMCA OF STATESVILLE: $5k → 9%YMCA OF STATESVILLE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.5M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+10%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GU
    GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +15%
  • DI
    DIAKONOS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $228k · revenue +74%
  • IC
    IREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • EC
    Elder Center Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education
2
Wingate University

A comprehensive educational institution offering baccalaureate, masters, and doctoral degrees.

Education
3
Southern Wesleyan University

Challenging students to be dedicated scholars and leaders who impact the world for Christ.

Education
4
Central Piedmont Community College

Central piedmont community college will be a champion of students, a catalyst for opportunity, and an exceptional provider of learning experiences that transform lives and strengthen our community. the college facilitates student learning,…

Education
5
Meredith College

Founded in 1891, meredith is one of the largest women's colleges in the southeast. meredith offers comprehensive liberal arts and professional studies for undergraduate women. at the graduate level, meredith offers co-educational mba,…

Education
6
Providence Christian College

The college provides a post-secondary liberal arts education from a historic Reformed Christian Perspective.

Education
7
Davidson-Davie Community College

To provide scholarships and other forms of support for the students of davidson-davie community college.

8
Elon University

Elon university's mission is to transform the mind, body, and spirit and encourage freedom of thought and liberty of conscience. the university provides a liberal arts undergraduate curriculum and graduate programs.

Education
9
North Carolina State University

Supports, by financial assistance and otherwise, the various colleges within the university, the libraries, and other university-connected functions.

Education
10
Charlotte Christian College &

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
11
Tennessee Wesleyan University

Four-year liberal arts college

Education
12
East Carolina University Educational

The mission of the east carolina university educational foundation, inc., d/b/a the pirate club, is to be the friend-raising and fund-raising arm of east carolina university's division i athletics program, representing the highest…

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iredell Christian Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gardner-Webb University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $770,000 · OtherMITCHELL COMMUNITY COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $540,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $159,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB+4 more — $30,150 · OtherGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY — $1,420,000 · EducationGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITYDIAKONOS INC — $228,000 · Human ServicesDIAKONOS IN…IREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC — $138,000 · Human ServicesIREDELL CHR…POWER CROSS — $115,000 · ReligionUnited Way of Iredell County Inc — $55,000 · PhilanthropyPURPLE HEART HOMES INC — $20,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,499,150Education$1,420,000Human Services$366,000Religion$115,000Philanthropy$55,000Public Benefit$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY — $1,420,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDIAKONOS INC — $228,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetIREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC — $138,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetPOWER CROSS — $115,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUnited Way of Iredell County Inc — $55,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPURPLE HEART HOMES INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DIAKONOS INC
  • Who funds IREDELL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds POWER CROSS
  • Who funds United Way of Iredell County Inc
  • Who funds PURPLE HEART HOMES INC
  • Who funds Elder Center Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Iredell County Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Cashion Family Foundation Inc · Wilson Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The James W Davis Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The James W Davis Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The James W Davis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph