Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James R & Mary Jane Barrett Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$191kCivil Rights$178kPublic Benefit$51kReligion$37kHuman Services$32kHealth$31kPhilanthropy$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$780k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY PEACEMAKER TEAMS$8,500
CAMPAIGN FOR PEACE DISARMAMENT AND COMMON SECURITY$8,500
INTERRELIGIOUS TASK FORCE ON CENTRAL AMERICA$8,500
NONVIOLENT PEACEFORCE$8,500
COMMUNITY MOVEMENT BUILDERS (BAP)$8,500
PSR - LA (BACK FROM THE BRINK)$8,500
ALLENDE PROGRAM IN SOCIAL MEDICINE FOR CIVILIAN MEDICAL RESOURCES NETWORK$8,500
A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE INC$8,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA ESTHER INC: $9k → 11%CASA ESTHER: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$524k · 25 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
14

Total granted

$524k
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+87%

Still filing today

52%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AJ
    A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +215%
  • VF
    Veterans For Peace Inc
    4× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +34%
  • RF
    Resources for Organizing and Social Change
    4× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • BA
    BRIDGES ACROSS BORDERS SEMBRANDO PAZ
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • TC
    TIDES CENTER SEPTEMBER 11TH FAMILIES FOR PEACEFUL TOMORROWS
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • LA
    LATIN AMERICAN & CARIBBEAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC BLACK ALLIANCE FOR PEACE
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fund for Nonviolence
Human Services
2
Global Policy Forum Inc

Research and education of United Nations activities

International
3
Working for Peace and Justice Inc

Education and advocacy for human rights

Education
4
Catalyst for Peace
Philanthropy
5
International Center On Nonviolent Conflict
Philanthropy
6
United for Peace & Justice Inc

To be a movement building coalition of organizations opposed to wars, opposed to empire-building and the policy of permanent war, opposed to domestic repression, and in support of domestic struggles for social and economic justice.

—
7
Win Without War Education Fund

Win Without War Education Funds purpose is to engage in education, research, and policy analysis.

International
8
The Pax Christi Fund for Peace

Promote around the world peace and reconciliation, freedom and respect for human rights, as well as the political and social responsibility of individuals and communities.

International
9
Buddhist Peace Fellowship

Drawing on the traditions of Engaged Buddhism, BPF strengthens the inherent connections between movement organizing and spiritual practice in three critical ways: 1) We offer spiritual support for people engaged in social, environmental,…

Religion
10
Michigan Peace Team Inc

To pursue peace through active nonviolence in places of conflict.

International
11
Everyday Peace Indicators

The organization conducts participatory research and evaluation in partnership with communities affected by conflict and builds bridges between diverse actors working on peace and conflict issues to inform peacebuilding practice, policy…

Civil Rights
12
Foundation for Middle East Peace
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nonviolent Peaceforce; the most unlike its peers is Casa Esther Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $30,425 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRISTIAN PEACEMAKER TEAMS INC: $30,050 · OtherCHRISTIAN PEACEMAKER TEAMS INCFRIENDSHIP OFFICE OF THE AMERICAS: $29,500 · OtherFRIENDSHIP OFFICE OF THE AMERICASResources for Organizing and Social Change: $29,500 · OtherResources for Organizing and Social ChangeNON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL: $29,500 · OtherNON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · OtherPROGRESSIVE FOUNDATIONNUKEWATCH: $15,000 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION: $14,925 · OtherSOA WATCH: $14,875 · OtherUS PEACE COUNCIL PEACE EDUCATION FUND INC: $14,500 · OtherALLENDE PROGRAM IN SOCIAL MEDICINE CIVILIAN MEDICAL RESOURCES NETWORK: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $13,500 · Other+11 more: $85,975 · Other+11 moreA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $47,425 · InternationalA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACENonviolent Peaceforce: $23,425 · InternationalNonviolent PeaceforceQUIXOTE CENTER INCORPORATED: $21,000 · InternationalQUIXOTE CENTER INCORPORATEDFELLOWSHIP OF RECONCILIATION INC: $21,000 · InternationalFELLOWSHIP OF RECONCILIATION IN…INTERRELIGIOUS TASK FORCE ON CENTRA: $17,000 · InternationalINTERRELIGIOUS TASK FORCE ON CE…CAMPAIGN FOR PEACE DISARMAMENT AND COMMON SECURITY INC: $17,000 · InternationalCAMPAIGN FOR PEACE DISARMAMENT …World Beyond War: $16,000 · InternationalWorld Beyond WarBRIDGES ACROSS BORDERS INC: $7,500 · InternationalWITNESS FOR PEACE: $7,050 · InternationalPROGRESSIVE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · InternationalVeterans For Peace Inc: $30,425 · Public BenefitCommunity Movement Builders Inc: $8,500 · Public BenefitLittle Friends for Peace Inc: $22,550 · Youth DevelopmentCASA ESTHER INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesPEACE TAX FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 · EducationMARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $7,875 · Arts & CultureOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Other$364,750International$184,400Public Benefit$38,925Youth Development$22,550Human Services$16,000Education$13,500Arts & Culture$7,875Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $47,425 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVeterans For Peace Inc: $30,425 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetResources for Organizing and Social Change: $29,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetNON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL: $29,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNonviolent Peaceforce: $23,425 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLittle Friends for Peace Inc: $22,550 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetQUIXOTE CENTER INCORPORATED: $21,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF RECONCILIATION INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetINTERRELIGIOUS TASK FORCE ON CENTRA: $17,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR PEACE DISARMAMENT AND COMMON SECURITY INC: $17,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetWorld Beyond War: $16,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCASA ESTHER INC: $16,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetMARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $7,875 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPax Christi USA: $7,050 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPROGRESSIVE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds Veterans For Peace Inc ↗
  • Who funds Resources for Organizing and Social Change ↗
  • Who funds NON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Nonviolent Peaceforce ↗
  • Who funds Little Friends for Peace Inc ↗
  • Who funds QUIXOTE CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF RECONCILIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERRELIGIOUS TASK FORCE ON CENTRA ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR PEACE DISARMAMENT AND COMMON SECURITY INC ↗
  • Who funds World Beyond War ↗
  • Who funds CASA ESTHER INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE TAX FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Movement Builders Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES ACROSS BORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Pax Christi USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust CoDE15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co · Impactassetsinc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James R & Mary Jane Barrett Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James R & Mary Jane Barrett Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Maryland Historical Society Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The James R & Mary Jane Barrett Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The James R & Mary Jane Barrett Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James R & Mary Jane Barrett’s filings →

More from the funding graph